The domains on which the activity of the ancients was chiefly
concentrated were agriculture and cattle rearing, trade, and handicraft.
Intellectual or artistic labour, which at the present day plays a very
important part as a means of earning a livelihood, was hardly considered
at all in Ancient Greece, and the artist, if he worked for pay, was put
on the same footing as the artisan; in fact there were very few
intellectual professions connected with money. These circumstances
changed somewhat in the Hellenistic period; but even there the
intellectual labour of teachers, physicians, etc., would be placed in
the same class with other occupations, though gradually, as the payment
of this labour increased, so did also the estimation in which it was
held.
As to the statistical relation in which agriculture, industry, and trade
stood to one another, there were naturally many changes as civilisation
advanced; and again, local circumstances in every part of Greece, in
every district, and perhaps even every city, as well as the geographical
position, the nature of the land, the adaptability of the soil for
cultivation, etc., were of importance for these branches; and again,
peculiarities of race, national prejudices, were often of great weight
in the choice of a profession. It was an idea not peculiar to the Doric
races, though most strongly developed among them, that in reality every
kind of work done for pay was unsuitable for a citizen, and that his
whole activity should be given without reward to the State; but this
theory--though the main features of it are defended even by philosophers
such as Plato and Aristotle, and it rests on the assumption that every
citizen must have sufficient possessions for himself and his family, and
obtain what he requires by the labour of slaves--was only gradually
developed, and was quite foreign to the Homeric age, as well as to the
period immediately following, in which Hesiod could venture to say that
not work but idleness was disgraceful. Changes in political conditions
produced other changes as well. When the old Monarchy was succeeded by
the rule of the Oligarchs, and the privileged class being in possession
of landed property and numerous slaves, devoted its whole activity to
military and political matters, the prejudice originated that only such
occupations were worthy of a free and noble citizen, and that all work
was low and servile; and it is natural that this opinion should have
been obstinately maintained at Sparta, because the constitution there
kept the character of the Oligarchy most rigidly. In other places a
healthier conception of work gradually prevailed, and, in particular,
the tyrants of the older period tried to combat the disinclination of
the citizens for professional activity; in their case, however, it was
not only reasons of political economy, but also political expediency
that influenced them, since they did not wish to see their rule
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account