word expressed the full scorn felt by the free citizen living on his own
fortune, and devoting all his intellectual and physical powers to the
State--of the gentleman, in fact--for the man with the horny hand, who
toiled in his workshop to earn his daily bread. This reproach of
“mechanical” was never aimed at the rich owner of a number of slaves,
who worked for his benefit; a factory owner need not take part in the
work himself, but had his overseers to attend to that; it was the little
man who had no other hands to work for him, and who wielded the hammer
himself, or who worked the cloth in the fuller’s shop, whom they looked
down on. In vain wise lawgivers tried to call the attention of the
citizens to the blessing of handicraft, and the honourable nature of
this occupation; in vain the democrats gave political equality to
artisans by permitting them to vote and speak in the Assembly of the
people along with the other citizens; while there was even a law
forbidding anyone publicly to reproach a citizen with his occupation.
There were some states in which an important part of the prosperity
depended on handicrafts, and there a more moderate view gradually made
way, but, generally speaking, the contempt for handicraft remained and
continued, the rather as even philosophers regarded it as but a
necessary evil. Doubtless they recognised the usefulness of
handicrafts, but still they maintained that work of this kind in the
workshop, near the hot furnace or in the gloomy room, was not suited to
a free citizen, and that the effort of gaining money which was connected
with it was injurious to the mind, and made it coarse and uncultivated,
and it was thus that the word _banausos_ came to be synonymous with
common, low, and stupid. No wonder that even the artists, whose work
depended on handicraft, and who, with few exceptions, worked for pay,
were put in the same class with shoemakers, bakers, and smiths! It is
strange indeed, that this depreciation of handicraft observed throughout
Greek literature in no way prevented the development and perfection of
the technical arts of Greece. There were many branches of it which
continued for centuries at the same point without making any technical
advances; but still trades attained a high degree of perfection in
antiquity, though it was chiefly in those where the practical element
was not as important as the artistic that the natural sense of beauty of
the Greeks made itself felt, so that there are numerous productions of
ancient handicraft which even our modern trades cannot rival. In fact,
we might almost say that, with the exception of such trades as bakers,
butchers, or fullers, Greek handicraft in almost every branch developed
into art, while at the present day there are only a few branches which
rise above the ordinary craft level.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account