The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and ManagementBevan, Edward
History
The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and Management
Bevan, Edward
Bee culture; Bees
I shall adduce another instance in support of my position that insects
are endowed with reason, and that they mutually communicate and receive
information. "_A German artist_ of strict veracity, states, that in his
journey through Italy, he was an eye-witness to the following occurrence.
He observed a species of _Scarabæus_ busily engaged, in making for the
reception of its egg a pellet of dung, which when finished, the insect
rolled to the summit of a hillock, and repeatedly suffered it to tumble
down the slope, apparently for the purpose of consolidating the pellet by
the adhesion of earth to it in its rotating motion. During this process,
the pellet unluckily fell into a hole, out of which the beetle was unable
to extricate it. After several ineffectual attempts, the insect went to
an adjoining heap of dung, and soon returned with three companions. All
four applied their united strength to the pellet, and at length succeeded
in pushing it out, when the three assistant beetles left the spot, and
returned to their own quarters[X]."
[Footnote X: Kirby and Spence, vol. ii. p. 522.]
+Mr. Hunter+ speaks rather sarcastically, upon the subject of reason
being one of the attributes of insects. "Reason," says he, "has been
ascribed to bees; they have been supposed to be legislators, and even
mathematicians; and though there is some show of reason for these
suppositions, there is much more of imagination." To show how far the
excursive fancy of apiarians had sometimes carried them, Mr. H. selected
a very unfortunate instance, namely, the assertion, as he calls it, that
workers' eggs may be converted into queens,--a fact which has since
been established by a series of the most satisfactory experiments. +Dr.
Virey+, in his _Nouvelle Dictionnaire d'Histoire Naturelle_, denies
that insects possess any portion of intellect, and attributes all their
operations to mere instinct, which he considers as the result of pure
mechanism, depending upon the construction of their nervous systems, in
the same manner as the tune played upon a barrel organ, is dependent on
the notes which the cylinder successively presents to its keys. +Des
Cartes+, and others before him, held a similar opinion, considering
insects as being simply susceptible of external impressions, and through
the medium of that susceptibility stimulated to act. If this doctrine be
correct, instinct is possessed alike by animals and vegetables; in short
by every thing that has life, the difference being not in quality, but in
quantity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account