The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and ManagementBevan, Edward
History
The Honey-Bee: Its Natural History, Physiology and Management
Bevan, Edward
Bee culture; Bees
+M. Reimar+ has denied that the lower animals possess _memory_, properly
so called; and has given it as his opinion, that they are only influenced
by past events, in consequence of having present objects before
them,--never by reflection or knowledge of the past, as being past.
But that, with them, a former impression may be renewed, without being
recollected; that it is thus rendered present to the imagination, but has
no place in the memory. For arguments and instances in support of their
being endowed with memory, see page 260. (Organs of Sensation.)
The possession of the organs of sense implies the possession of some
portion of intellect, for without intellect those organs would seem
incapable of being employed to the greatest advantage. "There is this
difference," says +Mr. Spence+, "between intellect in man, and the rest
of the animal creation. Their intellect teaches them to follow the lead
of their senses, and to make such use of the external world as their
appetites or instincts incline them to,--and _this is their wisdom:_
while the intellect of man, being associated with an immortal principle,
and connected with a world above that which his senses reveal to him,
can, by aid derived from heaven, control those senses, and render them
obedient to the governing power of his nature; and _this is his wisdom_."
A distinction has been made, and very properly, between wisdom and
knowledge. The former alone can be possessed by the lower animals, man
can possess both. The distinction between them has been very accurately
marked by +Cowper+, though in making it he has confined himself to man
only.
"Knowledge and wisdom, far from being one,
Have oft times no connection. Knowledge dwells
In heads replete with thoughts of other men,
Wisdom in minds attentive to their own."
It will, I think, be evident to my readers, from the general tenour of
this chapter, that though I make a distinction between the instinct
and the reason of bees, I do not confound their reason with the reason
of man. But to obviate all possibility of misconception, I will at once
define my meaning, when I use the terms insect reason and instinct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account