The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of HimFord, Paul Leicester
General
The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him
Ford, Paul Leicester
Labor movement -- Fiction; Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Political fiction; Tenement houses -- Fiction
“If you tell me that I misunderstood you, I will apologize. If you
think the statement insulting, I will withdraw it. I did not speak to
insult you; but because I wished you to know how your questions
impressed me.”
“When a man tells another he is contemptible, he cannot expect to
escape results. This is no place to have a scene. You may send me your
apology when we reach New York—”
Peter interrupted. “I shall, if you will tell me I wronged you in
supposing your questions to be malicious.”
Lispenard paid no attention to the interjection. “Otherwise,” he
finished, “we will consider our relations ended.” He walked away.
Peter wrote Lispenard that evening a long letter. He did not apologize
in it, but it ended:
“There should be no quarrel between us, for we ought to be friends. If
alienation has come, it is due to what has occurred to-day, and that
shall not cause unkind feelings, if I can help it. An apology is due
somewhere. You either asked questions you had no right to ask, or else
I misjudged you. I have written you my point of view. You have your
own. I leave the matter to your fairness. Think it over, and if you
still find me in the wrong, and will tell me so, I will apologize.”
He did not receive a reply. Meeting Ogden Ogden a few days later, he
was told that Lispenard had gone west for a hunting trip, quite
unexpectedly. “He said not to expect him back till he came. He seemed
out of sorts at something.” In September Peter had a letter from Miss
De Voe. Merely a few lines saying that she had decided to spend the
winter abroad, and was on the point of sailing. “I am too hurried to
see my friends, but did not like to go without some good-byes, so I
write them.” On the whole, as in the case of most comedies, there was
little amusement for the actual performers. A great essayist has
defined laughter as a “feeling of superiority in the laugher over the
object laughed at.” If this is correct, it makes all humor despicable.
Certainly much coarseness, meanness and cruelty are every day
tolerated, because of the comic covering with which it is draped.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account