The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of HimFord, Paul Leicester
General
The Honorable Peter Stirling and What People Thought of Him
Ford, Paul Leicester
Labor movement -- Fiction; Love stories; New York (N.Y.) -- Fiction; Political fiction; Tenement houses -- Fiction
“Broadly speaking, all persons of sound mind are entitled to vote on
the men and the laws which are to govern them. Aside from this, every
ounce of brain or experience you can add to the ballot, makes it more
certain. Suppose you say that half the people are too ignorant to vote
sensibly. Don’t you see that there is an even chance, at least, that
they’ll vote rightly, and if the wrong half carries the election, it is
because more intelligent people have voted wrongly, have not voted, or
have not taken the trouble to try and show the people the right way,
but have left them to the mercies of the demagogue. If we grant that
every man who takes care of himself has some brain, and some
experience, his vote is of some value, even if not a high one. Suppose
we have an eagle, and a thousand pennies. Are we any better off by
tossing away the coppers, because each is worth so little. That is why
I have always advocated giving the franchise to women. If we can add
ten million voters to an election, we have added just so much knowledge
to it, and made it just so much the harder to mislead or buy enough
votes to change results.”
“You evidently believe,” said Watts, “in the saying, ‘Everybody knows
more than anybody?’”
Peter had forgotten all about his company in his interest over—over the
franchise. So he started slightly at this question, and looked up
from—from his subject.
“Yes,” said Le Grand. “We’ve been listening and longing to ask
questions. When we see such a fit of loquacity, we want to seize the
opportunity.”
“No,” said Leonore, “I haven’t finished. Tell me. Can’t you make the
men do what you want, so as to have them choose only the best men?”
“If I had the actual power I would not,” said Peter.
“Why?”
“Because I would not dare to become responsible for so much, and
because a government of the ‘best’ men is not an American government.”
“Why not?”
“That is the aristocratic idea. That the better element, so called,
shall compel the masses to be good, whether they wish it or no. Just as
one makes a child behave without regard to its own desires. With grown
men, such a system only results in widening the distance between the
classes and masses, making the latter more dependent and unthinking.
Whereas, if we make every man vote he must think a little for himself,
because different people advise him contrarily, and thus we bring him
nearer to the more educated. He even educates himself by his own
mistakes; for every bad man elected, and every bad law passed, make him
suffer the results, and he can only blame himself. Of course we don’t
get as good a government or laws, but then we have other offsetting
advantages.”
“What are those?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account