The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
It will be observed that Mr. Smith speaks of these heavily muscled
horses as a _breed_, which expression, I suppose, is intended to be used
in a restricted sense. In the many generations of horses that would
necessarily succeed each other in a century, in the hands of a people
so devotedly fond of racing, it is merely an exercise of common sense,
among barbarous as well as civilized people all over the world, to “breed
to the winner.” In this way, and without any infusion of outside blood,
there would be improvement in the strength and fleetness of all animals
bred for the quarter path. He remarks further that “these likewise make
excellent saddle horses for the road.” In that day nothing was accepted
as a “saddle horse” that could not take the pacing gait and its various
modifications. This was true of Virginians of that day, and it is still
true of their descendants who have built up new States further west.
In the early days, as already intimated, it was the habit of Virginians
to brand their horses and then turn out all not in daily use to “hustle”
for their own living. As a matter of course these animals would often
stray long distances away, and not a few never were found. In due time,
legislation provided for the recovery of estrays, embracing all kinds
of domestic animals as well as negro slaves. Fortunately this enables
me to reach what may be considered “original data,” in determining the
size and habits of action of the early Virginian horses. As the field
of my examination, I have taken the _Virginia Gazette_, for the years
1751 and 1752, published at Williamsburgh, and in these volumes I find
a great many advertisements of “Strayed or Stolen” animals scattered
through the pages; and in the second especially a great many “Taken Up”
advertisements appear. In a very large proportion of these notices,
perhaps a majority of them, all the description that is given is the
color, sex and brand, with occasionally some natural mark. As a matter
of course these are of no value for the object in view. In some cases
the size is given without the gait, and in others the gait is given
without the size, in a few both size and gait are given. The range of
size is from one of fifteen hands down to one of twelve hands, with more
of thirteen hands than any other size, either above or below. The true
average of the whole number is a little over thirteen hands and one inch,
and none of them are called ponies. As further evidence of the small size
of the colonial Virginia horses we find that in 1686 the legislature of
Virginia passed an act providing for the forfeiture of all stallions
under thirteen and a half hands high found running at large. It provided
that any person might take up such stallion and carry him before a
justice of the peace, and if he measured less than thirteen and a half
hands, the justice was required to certify to the measurement and the
facts, and the horse passed legally to his new owner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account