The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
For several years after Henry Hudson, an Englishman in the employ of
the Dutch, discovered the harbor of New York and the great river which
took his name, in the year 1609, there is uncertainty and doubt as to
the nature of the settlement. For a time it seems to have been merely a
trading post, occupied only by those in the employment of the company
that owned it, and without many of the elements requisite to make up
a permanent colony. At Fort Orange (Albany) and at Esopus (Kingston),
the conditions were the same as at New Amsterdam, as New York was then
named. The first party of immigrants that seemed to have the elements of
permanent colonization about it arrived in 1625, and consisted of six
families and several single men, making in all forty-five persons, with
furniture, utensils, etc., and one hundred and three head of cattle.
Doubtless some of these “cattle” were horses, and the general instead
of the specific term was used in enumerating them. Very little is known
of the early horse history of the New Netherlands, as the whole region
was then named; there can be no doubt, however, that they increased and
multiplied. Sometime, probably about 1643, a cargo or two of horses were
brought up from Curaçoa and Azuba, in the Dutch West Indies, but the
climatic change was too great for them, and they did not do well, being
specially subject to diseases from which the Dutch horses seemed to have
complete immunity. In 1647, Isaac Allerton, as agent, was authorized to
sell twenty or twenty-five of these horses to Virginia, and whether the
authorities were able thus to get clear of a bad investment does not
appear from the existing records. In a report to the home company, made
in 1650, I find the following prices were given at that time: A young
mare with second foal, one hundred and fifty florins; stallion, four or
five years old, one hundred and thirty florins; milch cow, one hundred
florins. The same report makes a comparison by giving the prices of
New England horses, as follows: A good mare one hundred to one hundred
and twenty florins; stallion, one hundred florins; milch cow, sixty to
seventy florins. Neither horses nor cows were then allowed to be shipped
out of the province without permission of the council.
Adrien Van der Donck wrote a description of New Netherlands which was
published 1656, in which he speaks of the horse stock as follows:
“The horses are of the proper breed for husbandry, having been
brought from Utrecht for that purpose; and this stock has not
diminished in size or quality. There are also horses of the
English breed which are lighter, not so good for agricultural
use, but fit for the saddle. These do not cost as much as the
Netherlands breed and are easily obtained.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account