The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
has afflicted all England from that day to this. No humbug of either
ancient or modern times has had so long a run and so wide a range as
the miserable fallacy “that all excellence in the horse comes from the
Arabian.” Notwithstanding the thousand tests that have been made and the
thousand failures that have invariably followed, from the time of King
James to the present day, there are still men writing books and magazine
articles on the assumption that “all excellence in the horse comes from
the Arabian,” without ever having devoted an honest hour to the study of
the question as to whether this is a truth or a fallacy. This craze for
Arabian blood was the primary cause of the extinction of the pacer, and
this craze was so strong in its influence that when a foreign horse was
brought in, no difference from what country, if he were of the lighter
type he was called an Arabian and so advertised in order to secure
the patronage of breeders. Horses brought from the African coast were
invariably classed as Arabians, notwithstanding they and their ancestors
were in Africa more than a thousand years before there were any horses in
Arabia; and the same may be said of Spain. But as this line of inquiry
has already been considered in another chapter, I will get back to the
immediate topic.
The process of breeding out the pacer did not commence in real earnest
until the middle of the seventeenth century, when the Stuarts regained
the sovereignty of Great Britain in the person of Charles II. Released
from the restraints of Puritan rule, the Restoration brought with it a
carnival of immorality and vice, for the court and the courtiers set the
fashion and the people followed. As the breeding interest of the period
of which we now speak has already been considered in the chapter on the
English Race Horse, I will not further enlarge upon it. The light, or
running and hunting, horses of England of that day were not all pacers,
but they were all of the same type and the same blood, hence when I
speak of the pacers I include their congeners. They were small—less than
fourteen hands high—and not generally handsome and attractive. In general
utility they were ahead of the importations, and doubtless many of them
could run as fast and as far as the foreign horses, but the foreigners
had the advantage in size, especially the Turks and the Neapolitans;
besides this, they were more uniformly handsome and attractive in their
form and carriage. It is also probable that the outcross from the
strangers to invigorate the stock was needed and resulted in the increase
of the size of the progeny. This latter suggestion is inferential and has
been sustained by many similar experiences, but without this as a start
it would be exceedingly difficult to account for the rapid increase in
the height of the English race horse. It is certainly true that the chief
aim of the English breeder of that day was to increase the size, without
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account