The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
the tide of European settlers kept pouring in, we can easily understand
how the little bands of estrays should grow into larger bands and soon
become as wild as though they had never seen a human being except to flee
from him.
The explorer De Soto sailed for Florida in 1539, in search of gold. He
had in his command five hundred and thirteen men, exclusive of sailors,
and two hundred and thirty-seven horses, besides some for the purpose of
bearing burdens, the number not given. In all his weary journey of three
years he found the Indians active, hostile, and courageous fighters. In
one of his first battles he lost twelve horses, and had seventy wounded.
He pursued many phantoms in search of gold, in different directions,
but his general course was westward and northwestward. He was the first
European to discover the Mississippi River, not far from the mouth of
the Arkansas, and there he was buried in the middle of the river, to
prevent the Indians from discovering he was dead and from desecrating his
remains. His followers then determined to push on westward to Mexico,
and reached as far as the borders of Texas, probably, when they became
discouraged with the magnitude of the difficulties that surrounded
them, and determined to return and seek an outlet from the wilderness
by water. On this last journey, west of the Mississippi, they suffered
their greatest loss of horses. They had not been shod for more than a
year, and a great many were lame and unable to travel. When the Spaniards
had completed their boats and were ready to leave the scenes of their
sufferings and disasters, they turned loose upon the bank of the river
their four or five remaining horses, which manifested great excitement,
running up and down the bank neighing for their masters, as they sailed
away. This alarmed the Indians and they ran into the water for safety.
The Indians were afraid of the horses and the horses were afraid of the
Indians. It seems to be a fact, observed in all the early intercourse
of the Spaniards with the Indians, that universally they had a kind of
superstitious awe of the horse as a superior being, and it is probably
due to this awe that the Indians did not utterly destroy every horse that
fell out of the ranks or that escaped in the wilderness. As I understand
the history of this terrible exploration, when the Spaniards crossed the
Mississippi they had two hundred and fifty men and one hundred and fifty
horses, and when they came back and were ready to sail they had but four
or five horses left. It is fair, therefore, to conclude that the greater
portion of these hundred and fifty head was scattered in the wilderness
as they went out and as they returned. This provides a sufficient
breeding basis for the countless multitudes of descendants, and places
that nucleus in the right region to nourish them in a feral state.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account