The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
Of all
the curiosities in which the literature of the Arabian horse abounds
and in the multitudinous efforts to give him the primacy among horses,
there seems to be nothing quite so absurd as this story about his being
indigenous to the desert. Animals in a wild state are never found except
in countries and districts where the conditions surrounding provide them
with food and water. How long would a band of strong, healthy horses live
if turned loose to seek their own subsistence in the desert of Arabia?
Of all the countries on the face of the globe there is no one where the
horse is so completely dependent upon, the care and support of his master
as Arabia.
Fortunately, we are not left for data to unwritten traditions two
thousand years old, nor to the fervid imaginations of a race of
cutthroats and thieves of the very lowest order of civilization,
but we can turn, with full confidence, to authentic contemporaneous
history, from which we can settle this question, at once and for all
time. Strabo, the great Greek geographer and philosopher, flourished
in the reign of Augustus, at the very beginning of the Christian era.
He describes Arabia just as we know it to-day, for all countries have
changed in their boundaries and government except Arabia. He describes
the people as chiefly nomadic, and as breeders of camels. The most
remarkable thing in this description is the fact, found in his great
work, Vol. III., p. 190, that they had no horses at that time. The exact
language used in this statement will be found in the next chapter of
this work. The question now arises, If there were no horses in Arabia
at the beginning of the Christian era, when and how did they become
possessed of them? Fortunately, again, written history supplies the
answer to this question. In my next chapter will be found, quoted at
some length, the circumstances bearing on this question. In brief, the
facts are as follows: Philostorgius, a distinguished Greek theologian,
wrote an ecclesiastical history in the fifth century which is no longer
extant. Photius, at one time Patriarch of Constantinople, in the ninth
century wrote an epitome of the work by Philostorgius and to this
epitome we are indebted for the facts we here relate. Constantius, at
the time of which Philostorgius wrote, was on the throne of the Eastern
empire, and was exceedingly zealous in spreading and strengthening the
Christian religion. He learned that the prince of Arabia Felix (that
part of Arabia which we will designate by its modern name Yemen) was
strongly disposed to come out with his people and embrace Christianity.
Constantius thereupon determined to encourage both prince and people in
the movement they were contemplating, and he sent them a grand embassy
with many valuable presents, the most noted of which were two hundred
“well-bred Cappadocian horses.” The embassy was completely successful,
and Theopholis, who had been made a bishop and placed at the head of it,
remained there several years.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account