The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
This was in the year 356 of the Christian
era, and is the first intimation we have in all history of horses in
Arabia. These are the facts, so far as any facts are known, upon the
consideration of which I am not able to assent to the claim that either
High Asia or Arabia was the original habitat of the horse.
I have been surprised at the number of coincidences that seem to point
to ancient Armenia as the first habitation of the horse. This country
at one time was a very powerful kingdom, extending from the mountains
of Caucasus on the north to Media or Assyria on the south, and from
the Caspian Sea on the east to the Euphrates on the west, and at one
time even to the Mediterranean. It was intersected by several ranges of
mountains and not only gave rise to the Euphrates and the Tigris, but to
a number of smaller rivers. It was well watered everywhere, and produced
in great abundance all varieties of herbage, cereals, and fruits. It
was originally called Ararat by the Hebrews, probably after a range of
mountains about central to the territory embraced, and because Noah’s Ark
rested somewhere “on the mountains of Ararat.” It is also called Togarmah
in Scripture, after Torgom, son of Gomer, who was the son of Japheth,
the son of Noah. Japheth seems to have been the oldest son of Noah, and
he chose this fruitful region as the future home of his descendants.
The Rev. Michael Chamich, a native Armenian, went back into the old
Armenian records, translated the language as originally used, and wrote
a history of the country from its first settlement; and this history has
been Englished by Johannes Adval, another native Armenian, and published
in Calcutta in 1827. This work seems to be worthy of credence, and it
clearly establishes the lineal descent of the governing family back to
Japheth, the son of Noah. The order of succession as the head of the
tribe continues through several generations unbroken, from father to
son. Gomer, the son of Japheth, was succeeded by his son Togarmah, then
followed Haicus, Armenac, Aramais, Amassia, Gelam, Harma, Aram, Arah, who
was slain in battle, his son Cardus (at twelve years old), Anushaven, who
died without issue and was succeeded by Paret, who reigned fifty years
and during his reign the patriarch Joseph died in Egypt, B.C. 1635. These
princes all had long reigns. Haicus was the first of the line to assume
the title of king, and he was greatly distinguished for extending the
boundaries of his kingdom. Gelam extended his borders to the Caspian.
Aram was fifty-eight years on the throne, during which time he had a war
with the Medes, and also with the Cappadocians, in both of which he had
a large force of cavalry in the field. This was about seventeen hundred
years before the Christian era, and is the first mention of cavalry that
I have found in history, either sacred or profane. In both these wars
his cavalry was met by the cavalry of the enemy, equal to or greater
than his in numbers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account