The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and DevelopmentWallace, John Hankins
History
The Horse of America in His Derivation, History, and Development
Wallace, John Hankins
Horse breeds -- History; Horses -- Breeding -- United States; Horses -- United States -- History
How long before this troops may have been mounted
on horses it is impossible to say, but from the numbers so used at that
period of the world by the neighboring nations and tribes, as the Medes,
the Cappadocians, etc., it is fair to conclude that the horse had then
been an important factor in all military movements for many generations.
When we consider two opposing armies, each provided with divisions of
five thousand cavalry, the period being about B.C. 1700, with no dates
beyond that are known as relating to the horse, we are shut up to our own
reasoning as to the number of centuries that may have been required to
produce these great numbers. It must have been at least one century, or
it may have been three or four, and this would carry us back to the head
of the house of Japheth.
If we accept Egyptian chronology, which still lacks much of being
reliable, one of the Pharaohs, named Thutmosis I., invaded Syria, passing
up through Palestine till he reached the latitude of Aleppo, and then
turned eastward and crossed the Euphrates. His campaign was successful;
he fought many battles and returned laden with spoils, especially horses
and chariots of war. This was before the Israelites reached the promised
land, and before Joshua’s battle with the “Northern kings,” in which
they had “horsemen and chariots very many,” and which is the earliest
Scriptural instance in which horses were employed in battle.
The territory embracing the ancient countries of Eastern Asia Minor,
bounded on the north by the Black Sea and the Caucasian mountains, on
the south by the thirty-seventh degree of north latitude, and extending
to the Caspian Sea, has always been remarkable for the variety, value,
and abundance of its agricultural products. Many of the very early
historians have noted the fact that each one of the countries embraced
in this territory was distinguished for the excellence and numbers of
horses produced, and they appear in about the following order, namely,
Armenia, Cappadocia, Cilicia, Media. The last-named country embraced
what is now the northern part of Persia, and as between the “Medes”
and the “Persians” there is no little confusion in the public mind, as
sometimes one was on top and sometimes the other. Then, to add to the
confusion, the Assyrians came in, occupying the same country and the same
capitals. For our present purposes it is not necessary to enter into the
consideration of these successive dynasties. The Medes were comparatively
newcomers, and as they were a great military people their prominence
in horse history resulted more from the spoils of war and the tribute
in horses that they collected from their neighbors than from their own
production. Kitto says that in the time of the Persian empire the plain
of Nissæum was celebrated for its horses and horse races. This plain was
near the city of Nissæa, around which were fine pasture lands, producing
excellent clover. The horses were “entirely white” (probably grey) and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account