The House of Walderne: A Tale of the Cloister and the Forest in the Days of the Barons' WarsCrake, A. D. (Augustine David)
ReligionChristian
The House of Walderne: A Tale of the Cloister and the Forest in the Days of the Barons' Wars
Crake, A. D. (Augustine David)
Historical fiction
At Wolvesham the foreign lords were forced to surrender, and accepted
or appeared to accept their sentence of exile. But ere starting they
invited the confederate barons to a supper, wherein they mingled poison
with the food.
This nefarious plot Hubert discovered, happening to overhear a brief
conversation on the subject between the bishop’s chamberlain and the
Jew who supplied the poison, and whom Hubert secured, forcing him to
supply the antidote which in all probability saved the lives of the
four Earls of Leicester, Gloucester, Hereford, and Norfolk. The brother
of the Earl of Gloucester did die—the Abbot of Westminster—the others
with difficulty recovered.
Hubert had now a great claim not only on the friendship of his lord,
which he had earned before, but on that of these other mighty earls,
and they held a consultation together, to decide how they could best
reward him for the essential service he had rendered. The earl told the
whole story of his birth and education, as our readers know it.
“He has, it is true, rendered us a great service, but that does not
justify us in advancing him in chivalry. He must earn that by some deed
of valour, or knighthood would be a mere farce.”
“Exactly so,” said he of Hereford. “Now I have a proposition: not a
week passes but my retainers are in skirmish with those wildcats, the
Welsh. Let the boy go and serve under my son, Lord Walter. He will put
him in the way of earning his spurs.”
“The very thing,” said Earl Simon. “Only I trust he will not get
killed, which is very likely under the circumstances, in which case I
really fear the poor old father would go down with sorrow to the grave.
Still, what is glory without risk? Were he my own son, I should say,
‘let him go.’ Only, brother earl, caution thy noble son and heir, that
the youngster is very much more likely to fail in discretion than in
valour. He is one of those excitable, impulsive creatures who will, as
I expect, fight like a wildcat, and show as little wisdom.”
Hubert was sent for.
“Art thou willing to leave my service?” said the earl.
“My lord,” said poor Hubert, all in a tremble, “leave thee?”
“Yes; dost thou not wish to go to the Holy Land?”
“Oh, if it is to go there. But must I not wait for knighthood?”
The reader must remember that knighthood alone would give Hubert a
claim upon the assistance and hospitality of other knights and nobles,
and that once a knight, he was the equal in social station of kings and
princes, and could find admittance into all society. As a squire, he
could only go to the Holy Land in attendance upon some one else, nor
could he carry the sword and belt of the dead man whom he was to
represent. A knight must personate a knight.
Hence Hubert’s words.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account