Henry Street Settlement (New York, N.Y.); Poor -- New York (State) -- New York
In turn, the private banker, the employment agent, the ticket broker,
the lawyer, and the notary public have battened upon the helplessness
of the immigrant. Our experience has convinced us that in the interest
of the state itself the future citizens should be made to feel that
protection and fair treatment are accorded by the state. The greater
number of immigrants who come to us are adults for whose upbringing this
country has been at no expense. It would seem only just to give them
special protection during their first years in the country, to encourage
confidence in our institutions, and to promote assimilation. From an
academic point of view, it might be said that all institutions for the
citizen are available to the immigrant, but the statement carries with
it an implication of equal ability on the part of the latter to utilize
these institutions, and this is not borne out by the experience of those
familiar with actual conditions.
[Illustration]
Such thoughts as these lay back of an invitation to Governor Hughes to
dine and spend an evening at the settlement and there meet the colleagues
who could speak with authority on these matters.
The Governor left us armed with maps and documentary evidence. A few
months later the legislature authorized the creation of a commission to
“make full inquiry, examination, and investigation into the condition,
welfare, and industrial opportunities of aliens in the State of New
York.” Among its nine members were two women, Frances Kellor and myself.
Upon the recommendation of that commission the New York Bureau of
Industries and Immigration of the Department of Labor was created.[21]
Miss Kellor, the first woman to be head of a state bureau, became its
chief.
Pending the enactment of legislation, she and I, with a photographer and
a sympathetic companion interested in questions of labor, motored over
the state examining the construction camps of the barge canal (a state
contract), the camps connected with the city’s great new aqueduct, and
some of the canning establishments.
In the latter we found ample illustration of indifference on the part
of private employers. In the camps surrounding the canneries were
large numbers of idle children who should have been in school. The
local authorities were, perhaps not unnaturally, indisposed to enforce
the compulsory education law upon these children whose stay in the
community was to be a transient one. In the public work the New York
City contracts, with few exceptions, showed carefully thought-out and
standardized conditions for the men; but examination of the state
contracts showed that while elaborate provision had been made for the
expert handling of every other detail connected with the work, even to
the stabling of the mules, nowhere was any mention made of the men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account