The Huguenot: A Tale of the French Protestants. Volumes I-IIIJames, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
General
The Huguenot: A Tale of the French Protestants. Volumes I-III
James, G. P. R. (George Payne Rainsford)
Huguenots -- Fiction
He struggled with such feelings and such reflections for some time;
and then, forcing his thoughts to other things, he found that there
was plenty, indeed, for him to consider and to provide against, plenty
to inquire into and to ponder over, ere he resolved or acted. First
came the recollection of the quarrel between himself and the young De
Hericourt. He knew that the rash and cruel young man had made his
escape from the field, for he himself, with two of his servants, had
followed him close, and, by detaining a party of the pursuers, had
afforded the commander of the dragoons an opportunity to fly. That he
would immediately require that which is absurdly called satisfaction,
for the blow which had been struck, there could be no earthly doubt,
although the laws against duelling were at that time enforced with the
utmost strictness, and there was not the slightest chance whatsoever
of the King showing mercy to any Protestant engaged in a duel with a
Roman Catholic.
No man more contemned or reprobated the idiotical custom of duelling
than the Count himself; no man looked upon it in a truer light than he
did; but yet must we not forgive him, if, even with such feelings and
with such opinions, he prepared, without a thought or hesitation, to
give his adversary the meeting he demanded? Can we severely blame him
if he determined, with his own single arm, to avenge the wanton
slaughter that had been committed, and to put the barrier of a just
punishment between the murderer of so many innocent people and a
repetition of the crime? Can we blame him, if, seeing no chance
whatsoever of the law doing justice upon the offender, he
resolved--risking at the same time his own life--to take the law into
his hand, and seek justice for himself and others?
The next subject that started up for consideration was the general
events of that day, and the question of what colouring would be given
to those events at the court of France.
A peaceful body of people, meeting together for the worship of the
Almighty, in defiance of no law, (for the edict concerning the
expulsion of the Protestant pastors, and prohibiting the preaching of
the reformed religion at all, had not yet appeared,) had been brutally
insulted by a body of unauthorised armed men, had been fired upon by
them without provocation, and had lost several of their number,
murdered in cold blood and in a most cowardly manner, by the hands of
the military. They had then, in their own defence, attacked and
pursued their brutal assailants, and had slain several of them as a
direct consequence of their own crimes.
Such were the simple facts of the case; but what was the tale, the
Count asked himself, which would be told at the court of France, and
vouched for by the words of those, who, having committed the great
crime of unprovoked murder, would certainly entertain no scruple in
regard to justifying it by the lesser crime of a false oath?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account