III. In spite of the discoveries which were multiplied in caverns and
gravel-pits, even in the neighbourhood of Paris, the same objections
were brought against the believers in fossil man which Cuvier had
opposed to Amy Boué. The juxtaposition of the remains of extinct
animals and human bones, or articles of human workmanship, were
attributed to a _reformation_ effected by water. The high authority
of M. de Bramont lent new force to this argument. He compared the
alluvium of the neighbourhood of Abbeville to his _terrains des
pentes_, formed, he said, by storms of an exceptional violence, which
only happened once in a thousand years, and which heap up together
materials derived from different beds. As for the objects discovered
in caverns they inspired still less confidence than the others, on
account of the ease with which the bed might be undermined by eddies,
which would tend to deposit in the heart of a subjacent layer objects
derived from the upper layers, without destroying either the one or
the other.
Many men of high intellect still hesitated, until M. Lartet published
his remarkable work upon the grotto of Aurignac (1861). Here doubt
was impossible. This grotto, or rather rock-shelter, was closed at
the time of its discovery by a slab of stone brought from a distance;
M. Lartet discovered, either in the interior or at the entrance,
the bones of eight or nine species of animals which are essentially
characteristic of quaternary deposits. In his memoir he gives details
of all the remains. Some of these animals had evidently been eaten
upon the spot, their bones, partly carbonized, still bore the trace
of fire, the charcoal and ashes of which were discovered; those of a
young tichorhine rhinoceros showed marks made by flint implements,
and their spongy extremities had been gnawed by carnivora; the
species of the latter was shown by his excrement, which was
recognized as that of the _hyena spelæa_.
The grotto or rock-shelter of Aurignac is excavated in a small
mountainous group, a spur of the plateau of Lanémézan, which the
Pyrenean drift has never reached. It is, therefore, free from the
objections drawn from the intervention of aqueous currents. Thus the
facts made known by M. Lartet were generally accepted at once in
their fullest signification. These facts show that man lived in the
midst of a quaternary fauna, which he used as food, including the
rhinoceros, and was followed by the hyena of this epoch, who finished
the remains of his meals. The coexistence of man with these fossil
species was proved.
A few ill-judged attacks were still made by savants, who did not
accept the testimony of these facts, among others that of the
discovery of a human jaw made by Boucher de Perthes. But the
discoveries became so numerous that the last among them was soon
reduced to silence, and had to submit to the mention of _fossil man_
without raising the slightest protest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account