I recognise the force of the objection; but I also take into account
human intelligence, which they seem to forget. It is evidently owing
to this intelligence that the man of Saint-Prest, of the Victoria
cave, and of Monte Aperto has been able to survive two great
geological epochs. He protected himself against cold by fire, and
so survived till the return of a more genial temperature. Is it not
possible, therefore, to imagine that man of an earlier period should
have found in his industry the necessary resources for struggling
against the conditions which the transition from the later secondary
times to the earlier tertiary must have imposed upon him.
In fact, the most careful judges acknowledge that man has seen
the accomplishments of one of the great changes on the surface of
the globe. He has lived in one of the geological epochs to which
he was but lately thought to be a complete stranger; he has been
contemporary with species of mammalia which have not even seen the
commencement of the present epoch. There is then nothing impossible
in the idea that he should have survived other species of the same
class, or have witnessed other geological revolutions, or have
appeared upon the globe with the first representatives of the type to
which he belongs by his organisation.
But this is a question to be proved by facts. Before we can even
suppose it to be so, we must wait for information from observation.
BOOK IV.
ORIGINAL LOCALISATION OF THE HUMAN SPECIES.
CHAPTER XIV.
AGASSIZ’S THEORY.—CENTRES OF CREATION.
I. With the exception of Australasia, with which we are but very
imperfectly acquainted, and of some islands and deserts which we
need not take into account, all the regions visited by man since
the commencement of the era of modern discoveries have proved to be
more or less inhabited. In wandering over the globe of which he took
possession, the European has met with man everywhere, and quaternary
palæontology reveals him to us upon the most distant shores of the
two continents.
Are all these different populations indigenous? Is man a native
of the countries where he is represented by history, and where
travellers have met with him? or has he rather invaded by degrees
the surface of the globe, starting from a certain number of
points, or from a single one? In other words, has man, who is now
_cosmopolitan_, originally been more or less _localised_?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account