Must not the logical consequence of such positive language be, that
man forms a zoological family comprising several genera and many
species, precisely similar to the family of anthropoid apes? But
no; Agassiz devotes a new paragraph to declaring that this opinion,
which he has expressed so clearly, agrees entirely with the theory of
unity, and in no way brings human fraternity into question. In one
of his first memoirs upon questions of this nature, he declared that
_man is an exceptional being_, and we shall see how far he pushes
this unavoidable consequence of his theories.
In a letter addressed to the same authors, and printed in the
_Indigenous Races of the Earth_, Agassiz returns to the same subject.
He here insists upon considerations which, in his first work, he had
merely alluded to, and which we are truly astonished to receive from
his pen. In order to show that the same local causes have acted upon
man and animals, he draws attention to the resemblance of colour,
which, according to him, exists between the complexion of the Malay
and the colour of the hair of the Orang; from the same point of view
he compares the Negrittoes and Telingas with the gibbons.
If it were possible to consider seriously this comparison between
the skin of a human group, and the colour of the hair of an animal,
we should have no lack of arguments to bring against the author. I
shall only remind my readers that black gibbons are found in Sumatra,
which is one of those islands where men are considered by Agassiz to
resemble the orang in colour.
Carried away by the heat of controversy with those naturalists who
admit the unity of the geographical origin of man, Agassiz goes much
further than this. He considers the various languages as being of
primitive origin as well as all other characters. Men, he asserts,
were created by nations, each of which appeared upon the globe with
its own language. He draws a comparison between these languages and
the voices of animals; he laughs at philologists for their belief in
the discovery of any connection between one language and another.
In his opinion, there is just as much relation between one human
language and another, as between the growling of different species
of bears, the mewing of the cats of the two continents, the quacking
of ducks, or the song of thrushes, who all pour forth their gay and
harmonious notes, each in its dialect, which is neither inherited nor
derived from another.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account