Agassiz characterises this kingdom by the existence of one plant and
six species of animals, five mammals and one bird. The plant is the
Iceland lichen (cenomyce rangiferina). Now, this lichen is so little
characteristic of polar regions that it is found in many parts of
France, and even in the neighbourhood of Paris at Fontainebleau. M.
Decaisne believes that our hares and rabbits live upon it in winter,
as the reindeer do in Lapland. Further, the observations recently
made in Greenland by the German Polar Expedition, show that in this
country, which, of all countries in the Arctic Kingdom, should most
readily adapt itself to the conceptions of Agassiz, and which is
inhabited by pure-blooded Esquimaux, possesses scarcely one vegetable
species which can be said to be peculiar to it, and that a great
number of them are found in the Alps, and upon the summits of the
Vosges. It is a result of the return of heat after the glacial epoch,
the species which resisted it having emigrated in altitude as well as
in latitude.
In animal species, the white bear and the walrus are really polar.
The same may be said of the Greenland seal considered as a species.
But as a type we meet with it everywhere; as a genus it inhabits all
the seas of Europe. The reindeer inhabited France in the Quaternary
epoch; it was living in Germany in Cæsar’s time; it descended yearly
to the Caspian Sea during the lifetime of Pallas. The true whale
used to visit our coast before it was driven away by man. Finally,
at this day, the eider duck builds yearly in Denmark, ten to fifteen
degrees south of the Polar circle. Thus, in the six species mentioned
by Agassiz as peculiar to his Arctic Kingdom, three at least belong
equally to his European Kingdom.
Agassiz was certainly more capable than anyone else of nicely
characterising the region in question, if it had been possible to
do so. He failed, because there is in reality no such thing as
a true Arctic fauna. The cause of this lies in the extension of
more southern fauna, which become impoverished as they advanced
northwards, but change their character very slightly. In reality,
this kingdom is broken up into independent provinces, or rather, is
connected with regions situated more to the south, and consequently
better divided. The Polar region, says Lacordaire, in speaking of
insects, is characterised less by the speciality of its products than
by their scarcity. All these facts, again, are the consequence of the
peopling of the Arctic regions after the glacial epoch.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account