The assertion of Ad. de Candolle could not be more precise as far
as plants are concerned. “No phanerogamous plant,” he says, “is
distributed over the entire surface of the earth. There are only
eighteen whose area extends to half the globe. No tree or shrub
figures among these plants, which are so widely distributed.” This
latter remark belongs to an order of considerations which we shall
meet with again.
Being unable to enter into an examination of all the facts which
are offered by the various classes of the Animal Kingdom from this
point of view, I shall confine myself to a few details upon birds and
mammals.
We should expect to find the former presenting very extensive areas
of habitation by reason of their mode of locomotion. It is, in fact,
among them that we find some of the species which most deserve the
epithet of cosmopolitan. They do not, however, equal man in this
respect.
The stock-dove, the parent stock of our domestic pigeon, extends
from the south of Norway to Madeira and Abyssinia, from the Shetland
Islands to Borneo and Japan; but it does not reach as far as either
the equator or the polar circle; and it is wanting both in America
and Polynesia.
The fulvous vulture is found in all the temperate regions of the old
world, crosses the equator in Africa and descends as far as the Cape.
But we do not meet with it either in our polar regions, in America or
in Polynesia.
The peregrine falcon has perhaps of all animals the widest area. It
is found in America, as also in all the warm or temperate regions of
the old world. It is supposed to exist in Australia, but we do not
meet with it either in Polynesia or in the polar regions.
Among mammals, whales, on account of their immense powers of
locomotion and the continuity of seas, would seem to be adapted to
true cosmopolitanism. This, however, is not the case. They are almost
all confined within relatively very limited areas, and rarely pass
beyond their customary boundaries. Commodore Maury regarded the
equatorial sea as forming an invincible obstacle to their passage
from one hemisphere to the other. Two exceptions have, however,
been observed to this rule. A rorqual (_Megaptera longimana_) and
a _Sibaldius laticeps_ are said to have crossed this barrier, and
to have passed from our seas to those of the Cape and of Java.
These exceptions might easily be explained by various accidental
circumstances. Supposing however we were to accept them as testifying
an exceptional relative cosmopolitanism, we still have the fact that
they have never been met with in the Pacific Ocean.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account