I. The first men who peopled the centre of human appearance must at
first have differed from each other only in individual features. At
their beginning and during an indefinite lapse of time, mankind could
only have been homogeneous, as is every animal and vegetable species
which is restricted to an area of small extent.
At the present time, we find mankind composed of numerous groups,
which have peculiar characters, and constitute so many distinct
races. How have these races originated? and how have they grown and
multiplied?
To give a definite reply to these questions, by going back from
recent effects to first causes, is still impossible, and perhaps will
always be so. Nevertheless, science may even now approach the general
aspects of the problem. We are well acquainted with the circumstances
under which varieties originate and races are formed among plants
and animals: we have established in man the occurrence of a number
of phenomena, which are in this respect identical, or very similar
to those exhibited by the two inferior kingdoms. We are therefore
clearly authorised to apply inferences drawn from them to ourselves,
connecting particular with general facts. This study is instructive
in many respects. Unfortunately, we cannot fully enter upon it here;
we can only select some facts in the history of animals to justify
our conclusions.
II. The problem of the formation of human races presents two very
distinct cases. Man at first was subject to the sole action of
_natural modifying agents_. Under this influence _pure races_ were
formed. When these races came in contact, they were _crossed_;
this resulted in the formation of _mixed races_. Without being
antagonistic to the natural forces, _crossing_ modifies them by its
peculiar phenomena, and sometimes masks their manifestations. The two
cases, therefore, require separate examination. We will begin with
the first.
III. Every organic species considered as a whole appears to be
subjected to the action of two forces, one of which tends to maintain
and the other to modify its characters. To what cause can this double
action be referred? This is a question put by the greatest thinkers
and the most eminent physiologists, from Aristotle and Hippocrates to
Burdach and J. Müller.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account