The chief means which man uses for the attainment of these results,
which at times seem to border on the marvellous, is _selection_. Ever
since he has possessed domestic animals he has marked out among them
individuals which are better adapted than the rest to his intentions.
By some kind of instinct, or _unconsciously_, as Darwin says, he has
chosen them to breed from. By rejecting the types which he considers
inferior, and only employing the higher types wherewith to propagate
the species, he has directed the action of heredity in a definite
direction, and has readily created races. Now, man has acted in this
manner since the times spoken of in Genesis and by Chou-King, that
is, for thousands of years. Is it then surprising that he should
have multiplied around him hereditary forms which are more or less
distinct from the primitive types?
_Progressive selection_ would doubtless lead to numerous and varied
results. Would it allow of the creation of races whose characters
almost reach hemitery? The answer to this question is at least
doubtful. But we have not to ask it. When by one of the actions of
the conditions of life, whose origin remains obscure, an almost
teratological animal form is produced, it soon disappears by the
mixture of blood from different sources, if unions are left to
chance. This is the reason why analogous facts are not observed in
feral races. But if this form appears in a domestic animal, if it
answers to any want or caprice, selection intervenes, preserves it,
and multiplies it. This explains the origin of the Ancon sheep, which
were all descended from a single ram of which we have spoken above;
also the means by which M. Graux de Mauchamp has raised his race of
sheep with silky fleeces from a single ram. These two examples show
how all those peculiar races have been obtained, which in some of
their characters seem to clash with the very type from which they
were derived. In the canine species the beagle corresponds to the
Ancon sheep; the _niata_ cattle, which have appeared in South America
since its conquest, correspond to the bull-dog, etc.
VIII. Races, when once formed under man’s influence, are fixed by the
same causes which produced them. Their characters, which at first
were entirely artificial, become more and more fixed, so much so,
that even a very considerable change in the conditions of existence,
never effaces them entirely. The _acquired nature_ is, so to speak,
welded to the original nature of the being.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account