But, although this civilization will become more general and more
widely spread, it will not suppress certain differences in the
conditions of life. As long as there are poles and an equator,
continents and islands, or mountains and plains, races will exist
distinguished by characters of every kind, and superior or inferior
in a physical, intellectual, and moral point of view. In spite of
crossings, varieties and inequalities will continue. But as a whole,
mankind will be perfected; it will have grown; and the civilizations
of the future, without causing those of the past to be forgotten,
will outstrip them in some as yet unknown direction, just as ours
have outstripped those of our predecessors.
* * * * *
V. I have just closed the statement of the most general questions
raised by the history of the human race.
The principal point to determine is the _unity_ or the _multiplicity
of the species_. There are some anthropologists, even men of high
distinction, who regard it as almost an idle question, as merely a
question of dogma or of philosophy. Nevertheless, a little reflection
is sufficient to make it intelligible, that the science is entirely
changed according as it is regarded from a monogenist’s or a
polygenist’s point of view. I have already pointed out this fact; and
beg permission to return to it in a few words.
After the fundamental question of unity comes that of _antiquity_.
This is put similarly in the two doctrines. But the problem is simple
and absolute for the monogenist, but multiple and relative for the
polygenist.
The _question of the place of origin_, which next presents itself,
only exists in reality for the believer in the specific unity
of human groups. The doctrine of autochthonism, though greatly
multiplying the question, reduces it to very simple terms, since
it declares that all the populations were born upon the spot whose
foreign origin it does not establish, and only admits movements of
expansion.
For the polygenist the _general question of migrations_ does not
exist. For particular cases autochthonism supplies everything. He
who regards the Polynesians as having appeared on the islands of the
Pacific has not to seek whence they might have come.
The _question of acclimatisation_ for the polygenist is reduced to a
small number of facts almost exclusively modern, human populations
being in his eyes naturally formed for living under the conditions of
life in which they were born.
The _question of the formation of races_ disappears entirely for the
polygenist, since the different species admitted by him have appeared
with all the characters which distinguish the different human groups.
At most he has to concern himself with the results of some modern
crossings which are too evident to be denied.
The _question of primitive man_ does not exist for the polygenist,
since he recognizes all _his species_ with the characters which they
have had from the commencement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account