I, personally, long cherished a belief in these panegyrics. I used to
think: After all, it really is a grand idea! “Seized him and ...
pardoned!” Pardoned! That was what really fascinated me. Whom did he
pardon? A mouse! A miserable mouse! And then I would rush off to some
one of my poetical friends to tell him of this new act of magnanimity on
the part of the Eagle. And my poetical friend would strike an attitude,
breathe hard for a moment, and then ... would become affected with the
sea-sickness of versification.
One day, though, the idea occurred to me: What did the Eagle “pardon” in
the mouse? All that the mouse had done was to run across the road on its
own private business; and the Eagle saw it, swooped, squeezed it half to
death, and ... pardoned it! Why in the world did the Eagle pardon the
mouse and not the mouse the Eagle?
Well, I began to look about me and take notice of things; and the more I
saw, the more muddled I got. There certainly was something askew about
the whole business. In the first place, it is evident that the Eagle
does not catch mice for the purpose of pardoning them. In the next
place, even if the Eagle did pardon the mouse, I cannot help thinking
that it would have been still better if he had taken no interest in its
affairs at all. And, finally, in the third place, granted he is an
Eagle—an Arch-eagle for that matter—all the same he’s a bird. Indeed, he
is so essentially a bird that, even for a policeman, a comparison with
him can be considered complimentary only in virtue of a
misunderstanding.
My present opinion concerning Eagles is as follows:—Eagles are
Eagles—and that is the long and short of the matter. They are simply
carnivora, birds of prey; but, it is true, they have this justification:
that Nature herself made them anti-vegetarians. As they are, moreover,
powerful, long-sighted, agile, and merciless, it is perfectly natural
that, whenever they appear, the entire feathered kingdom does its best
to hide itself away. This is simply the effect of terror, and not at all
of admiration, as the poets maintain. Eagles habitually live in solitary
and inaccessible places; never exchange bread-and-salt with any one;[60]
but live by robbery; and, when not engaged in burgling, go to sleep.
There turned up, however, a certain Eagle who grew sick of living in
solitude. So one day he said to his mate: “It’s a fearful bore to live
in this fashion, _tête-à-tête_; if one does nothing but gaze at the sun
the whole day long, it muddles one’s head.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account