The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
They stole our name [he went on]. They have a political idea
instead of the union idea.... After the 1908 convention, when
the politicians of the Socialist Labor Party found themselves
outside of the I. W. W., they held a conference in Paterson, N.
J., and they decided they would [have] an organization of their
own, with a political clause; and when they came to decide on a
name there was much debate. [The name "Socialist Labor Union"
was proposed.] ... But another motion prevailed, and they stole
the name of the I. W. W., and called themselves the Industrial
Workers of the World, although they don't amount to much.[491]
What the doctrinaires thought of the direct-actionists--or at least
what their leaders wanted workingmen in general to think of them--is
of equal importance. In a leaflet published by the Detroit faction we
are told that "the anarchist element that still calls itself the I. W.
W. proceeded from the close of the 1908 convention to reveal its true
nature by its actions. The western official organ of this element '_The
Industrial Worker_,' of Spokane, Wash., began to advocate theft, petty
larceny, chicken-stealing, breaking up small employment agencies, and
also advised the workers to 'strike at the ballot-box with an ax.'"[492]
When the doctrinaires held their 1915 convention (the "Eighth I. W. W.
Convention") General Secretary Richter, in his report, took pains to
pay his compliments to the direct-actionists.
The anarcho-syndicalist aggregation [he said], the so-called
"Chicago I. W. W." which in 1908 with great blare of trumpets
was going to show the workers how to get out of capitalism,
_via_ "sabotage" and "direct action" in double-quick time--what
is left of them has a precarious existence, trimmed to a
frazzle by the relentless forces of social progress, their
panaceas shrivelled, they make indeed a sorry-looking
crowd.[493]
A few months before this, Richter remarked: "Many of the followers of
the Saint [St. John] and 'Big Bill' [Haywood] are a sadder but wiser
lot. Hundreds have already joined the Socialist [meaning the Detroit]
I. W. W., and more are on the way."[494]
The Chicago I. W. W. was bracketed with the American Federation of
Labor as being equally with it a snare and a delusion to the working
class.
We find the Bummery [the Chicago I. W. W.] denying the
ballot-box; we find the American Federation of Labor denying
the class struggle and proclaiming the identity of interest
between master and slave; we find the Socialist party of
America ... seeking the support of the craft union; ... we
find the Socialist Labor party which says the workers must own
collectively the land and the tools; ... we find the I. W. W.
of Detroit which says the workers must come together on the
political and industrial fields....[495]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account