The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
The biennial conference of the International (Labor) Secretariat
met at Budapest, Hungary, August 10-12, 1911. The entire first day's
session was taken up with a lengthy argument over the admission of W.
Z. Foster, the I. W. W. delegate. His credentials were finally rejected
since he had only the support of the French _Confédération Générale du
Travail_.[536] President Gompers of the American Federation of Labor,
in his report to its convention held later on in the same year, refers
to "the repudiation of the so-called Industrial Workers of the World"
at the Budapest conference. "Inasmuch," he said, "as the would-be
delegate for the corporal's guard that composes the Industrial Workers
of the World professed to support the policies and program of the
_Confédération Générale du Travail_ of France, his pretensions were
supported by the latter organization."[537] James Duncan, the A. F. of
L. delegate at Budapest, reported that "a misguided man, named Foster,
from Chicago, claiming to represent an alleged organization of labor
in America, called the International [_sic_] Workers of the World, had
been for some time in Paris ..." and had apparently convinced the C.
G. T. that he should be recognized at the Budapest conference instead
of the A. F of L. representatives. "During the discussion Foster lost
control of his temper," said Duncan; "he even threatened
assault ...--ocular demonstration of what an I. W. W. really is(!) ...
[But] the Frenchmen were not dismayed at their tricolor being smudged
with I. W. W. mire."[538]
French syndicalism, then, has entered the I. W. W. to give it certain
characteristic strike tactics and a set of foggy philosophical
concepts about the General Strike, the "militant minority," _etc._
To this extent the I. W. W. is a syndicalist union. In structure it
is a decentralized body (to the extent that it has any body to be
decentralized), whereas the C. G. T. is decidedly centralized. In its
organization and in its attitude toward compatriot labor bodies it is
at variance with the French Confédération. The French idea has taken
more definite form in the United States in the shape of the Syndicalist
League of North America.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account