The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
the _défi_ they hurled at the church. Only less so was the _défi_
they leveled at the flag. The I. W. W. said that the church, obedient
to the dictates of big business, preached to the workers a servile
obedience now for the sake of a hypothetical heaven of comfort later;
"_ergo_," they said, "the church is unethical and we abjure it for a
superior proletarian ethics." It considered that the flag was being
made the excuse for a jingo patriotism which made the enlargement and
conquest of markets and the further exploitation of labor the end and
aim of patriotism. In brief, the church and the flag are made to serve
commercialism. Commercialism is evil because unjust. Therefore, its
servants are, _pro tanto_, evil also and rightly to be repudiated.
The conflicting attitudes are well illustrated by two placards carried
along Lawrence streets during the strike. The I. W. W. paraded first
with, among others, a placard reading:
XX Century civilization.... For the progress of the human race
we have jails, gallows, guillotines, ... and electric chairs
for the people who pay to keep the "_soldiers_" to kill them
when they revolt against Wood and other czars of capitalism.
_Arise!!! Slaves of the World!!!
No God! No Master!
One for all and all for one!_
The citizens (no reference here to the textile operatives) of Lawrence
paraded their righteous indignation as follows:
"For God and Country,
The Stars and Stripes forever,
The Red Flag never.
A Protest against the I. W. W.,
Its principles and methods."
Perhaps there is no better illustration of the reaction of the great
bulk of the progressive citizenship of the country to the I. W. W.
strike-drama than the following editorial paragraph published during
the strike:
On all sides people are asking: Is this a new thing in the
industrial world?... Are we to see another serious, perhaps
successful, attempt to organize labor by whole industrial
groups instead of by trades? Are we to expect that instead of
playing the game respectably, or else frankly breaking out into
lawless riot which we know well enough how to deal with, the
laborers are to listen to a subtle anarchistic philosophy which
challenges the fundamental idea of law and order, inculcating
such strange doctrines as those of "direct action," "sabotage,"
"syndicalism," "the general strike," and "violence"?... We
think that our whole current morality as to the sacredness of
property and even of life is involved in it.[587]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account