The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
socialism." As the two groups lined up at Chicago in 1913, we may say
that the controversy between the administration's supporters and the
defenders of the local unions was, on the whole, a struggle between the
western membership, individualistic and tainted with anarchism, and the
eastern membership, more schooled to subordination--infected with state
socialism.
The attack of the decentralizers took the form of specific resolutions
for the abolition of various features of the general administration
and the restriction of the powers of the Executive Board and general
officers. The abolition of the office of president in 1906 was in
part an expression of this revolt against centralized authority. But
now, with the presidency eliminated, with very little organization
at the best, with a degree of central power and authority which the
United Mine Workers of America would consider mild indeed, and with
a constantly shifting membership of less than 15,000, we find that
there is actually a little group of western locals which assumes that
there is already a dangerous centralization of power and authority
at "Headquarters." Some five hundred resolutions were introduced at
the convention and a large number of these were assorted decentralist
proposals for giving the local union relatively greater power--demands,
in other words, for readjustments which were expected to result in
increased "local autonomy." This local autonomy was to be secured for
the benefit of the "rank and file," _i. e._, the individual members,
and particularly for the "rank and file" membership of the "mixed"
locals so predominant in the western part of the country. From the
standpoint of the mixed local, "the disease within the I. W. W.
is ... the gigantic machine formation attempted to be [_sic_] foisted
upon it by the authoritarian socialists who presided at its birth...."
"Decentralization deals essentially," we are told, "with the right of
the locals to _control_ themselves and through their combined wills
to run the general organization."[607] Following up the attack, the
knights of the rank and file proposed to abolish, _inter alia_, the
General Executive Board, the office of the General Organizer, and the
national convention![608] One wonders that the Constitution itself
was not put bodily on the _index_! Indeed, a year later, a leader in
the movement in California did write an article to show that the I. W.
W. Preamble is syndicalistic, and the Constitution state-socialistic,
therefore that the latter should be abolished.[609] For two weeks the
delegates wrangled over propositions of this kind and the general
subject of decentralization. Two and a half days were devoted to the
proposal to abolish the General Executive Board. This action was
desired by locals in southern California and other parts of the West,
as well, as by a few of the eastern locals.[610] Concerning their
demands, a supporter of the administration said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account