The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
not depend [so much] upon votes as it does upon the recognition ... of
the fact that all minorities are to have an equal voice ... with the
majorities ... [because] the minority is always more militant than the
majority."[622] In the same issue which carried this statement, the
_Voice of the People_ said editorially:
[The decentralization struggle in the I. W. W. is] a war
between the advocates of "I am going to save myself" and those
of "let me save you."... Centralization in labor unions is
nothing less than government by representation, or political
action. The advocates of centralization in the I. W. W. are
socialists, in fact, if not in profession.... Only when they
repudiate labor-union governmentalism will they become real
direct-actionists.[623]
The "decentralist agitation" first assumed definite form at a
conference of the Pacific Coast locals of the I. W. W. held at
Portland, Oregon, in February, 1911. At this conference the eight-hours
movement, plans for the establishment of agitation circuits for
organizers, and--this most of all--the evils of centralized authority
were discussed.[624] At this conference was established the Pacific
Coast District Organization, known among the I. W. W.s as the "P. C.
D. O." This organization was an interesting compromise between the
idea of absolutely self-governing locals on the one side and servile
locals completely controlled by a bureaucratic national machine on the
other. It undertook to exercise some of the sovereign functions of
"Headquarters." According to a member of the General Executive Board,
this P. C. D. O. was to have its own due stamp books,
headquarters, General Secretary, General Executive Board, and
paper--this paper was the [_Industrial_] _Worker_. But the P.
C. D. O. made no success ... because of not having a strong
enough ground to build upon in order to interest the western
membership.[625]
It was believed in some quarters--especially at "Headquarters"--that
the real purpose of the Western Slope constituency which organized the
P. C. D. O. was to disrupt the I. W. W., or to effect a secession from
the national body. Some months after the Conference above referred to
an editorial appeared in _Solidarity_--the administration, organ. It
declared that their purpose
was to disrupt the I. W. W. and form an independent
organization in the West. The Conference itself proposed
that the G. E. B. reduce the _per capita_ [tax] to the P. C.
D. O. to five cents and allow the locals in that district
organization to buy their stamps directly from the district
headquarters.... The final conclusion of the sixth convention
was that such an organization as the P. C. D. O., for purposes
of closer unity, localized activity and propaganda, was fully
justified and should be supported, but efforts to divide or
disrupt the organization as a whole would be fought to the
bitter end.[626]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account