The I. W. W.: A Study of American SyndicalismBrissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
History
The I. W. W.: A Study of American Syndicalism
Brissenden, Paul F. (Paul Frederick)
Industrial Workers of the World; Syndicalism
All this friction and internal discord was naturally made to loom
large in the editorials of the _American Federationist_; Gompers, in
fact, squinted hard enough at the Chicago conference to see absolutely
nothing in it. The August (1905) number contained the following, under
the caption "Those 'World Redeemers' at Chicago":
After an effort of more than six months ... the distribution
of tons upon tons of circulars and "literature" throughout
America and every other country throughout the globe ... what
was the result? The mountain labored and brought forth a mouse,
and a very silly little mouse at that.... And out of this
material [the S. T. and L. A. and the A. L. U.] they proclaim
themselves the "Industrial Workers of the World." Their nerve
is so colossal that it is positively ludicrous. Of course the
two and a half million ... workmen in the trade-union movement
are entirely oblivious that they are included.... The wheel
of fortune, otherwise known as ex-Father Hagerty's chart, was
adopted as a "plan" of organization. This plan is so unique
and so fantastic that we accord it space in our columns and
thus give it historic importance.... [And finally he prophesies
that] as time goes on the active participants in the labor
movement of the future, students, thinkers, historians, will
record the Chicago meeting as the most vapid and ridiculous in
the annals of those who presume to speak in the name of labor,
and the participants in the gathering as the most stupendous
impossibles the world has yet seen.[171]
But in spite of dissension on the inside and bitter abuse and
misrepresentation on the outside, the industrialists were, on the
whole, very optimistic about the prospects of the new-born I. W. W. and
held high hopes for its future. In spite of the emphatic declaration
of the manifesto that the I. W. W. "should be established as the
economic organization of the working class, without affiliation with
any political party," the newspapers and even the labor press persisted
in representing the movement as a political one. Thus the Milwaukee
_Journal_ said:
The Socialists are still earnestly advocating the formation of
a new national organization in the hope of downing the American
Federation of Labor, as the Federation is opposed to making the
labor union a political organization.[172]
The _Advance Advocate_, a labor organ, had this to say:
And now a new industrial union is to be launched in Chicago. It
is going to revolutionize the whole labor movement according to
the manifesto of its promoters. It is going into politics. We
predict that it will fail.[173]
The Iowa State Federation of Labor issued the following statement:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account