The Industrial History of EnglandGibbins, Henry de Beltgens
History
The Industrial History of England
Gibbins, Henry de Beltgens
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Industries -- Great Britain -- History
§ 3. THE REVOLUTION IN MANUFACTURES AND THE FACTORIES--Although these
machines of which we have just spoken were intended at first for use
in the manufacture of cotton, they rapidly extended to that of woollen
and linen fabrics. It is impossible here to describe all the various
modifications and adaptations that were thus made; we can only refer to
the general features of the great change. The most remarkable of these
features was the sudden growth of factories, chiefly of course at first
for spinning cotton or woollen yarn. The old factories, had perforce
been planted by the side of some running stream, often in a lonely
and deserted spot, very inconvenient for markets and the procuring of
labour; but necessarily so placed for the sake of the water. Those of
my readers who know Yorkshire or Lancashire fairly well may remember
how frequently in the course of some long country walk near Bradford,
Halifax, Leeds, or Manchester, they come upon the ruins of some old
mill, crumbling beside a rushing stream, a silent relic of the old days
before the use of steam. How wonderful must the first rude inventions
have seemed to the workers in those old factories, as the strange new
machinery rattled and shook in the quiet country hollows, and the becks
and streamlets ran down to turn the new spindles and looms that were to
revolutionize the face of agricultural England. But the old water-mills
gave way to others worked by steam power, and now it was no longer
necessary to choose any particular site for the works. So the new race
of manufacturers made haste to run up steam-factories wherever they
could. “Old barns and cart-houses,” says Radcliffe, “outbuildings of
all descriptions were repaired; windows broke through the old blank
walls, and all were {162} fitted up for loom-shops; new weavers’
cottages arose in every direction.” The merchants too, who did not run
factories on their own account, but merely purchased yarn, began to
collect weavers around them in great numbers, to get looms together
in a workshop, and to give out warp themselves to the workpeople. And
now the workers began to feel the difference between the old system
and the new. Formerly they used to buy for themselves the yarn they
were to weave, and had a direct interest in the cloth they made from
it, which was their own property. They were in fact economically
independent. The new system made them dependent upon the merchant or
upon the mill-owner. At first, it is true, they gained a rise in wages,
for the increase in production was so great that labour was continually
in demand, and every family, says Radcliffe, brought home forty to one
hundred and twenty shillings per week. But this did not last very long.
The new machinery soon threw out of employment a number of those who
had worked only by hand; it enabled women and children to do the work
of grown men; it made all classes of workers dependent upon capitalist
employers; it introduced an era of hitherto unheard-of competition. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account