The Industrial History of EnglandGibbins, Henry de Beltgens
History
The Industrial History of England
Gibbins, Henry de Beltgens
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Industries -- Great Britain -- History
§ 4. THE OUTBREAK OF THE GREAT CONTINENTAL WAR--But although the War
of Independence cost us a great deal, it did not greatly affect the
development of our home industries. The Industrial Revolution went
steadily on, and for just thirty years (1763–93) the country, though
not entirely at peace, was yet sufficiently undisturbed to make rapid
progress in the new manufacturing methods. But in 1789 the French
Revolution broke out, and for over twenty years Europe was plunged into
a disastrous and exhausting conflict. At the first outbreak of the
Revolution, England looked on quietly. Many men were openly glad that
the downtrodden masses of the French nation had overthrown the tyranny
of an upper class whose only {172} idea of their duty in life was to
extort the last farthing from those below them, in order to spend it
in irresponsible debauchery. Statesmen like Fox gloried in it; the
younger Pitt was anxious not to interfere. But Pitt was forced into
action by the capitalists, who now were equal with the land-owners as
the two ruling powers of England. He saw that the conquests which the
new French Republic was already beginning to make might help France to
secure again her old position as the most formidable rival of English
commerce. If now this rival could be finally struck down, England was
sure of the control of the world’s markets. It was obviously the policy
of England to check the power of France, and when war was declared by
the young Republic, England was not slow to answer the challenge. After
this England was plunged headlong into the great European struggle of
Monarchy against Republicanism. Pitt gained the support of all classes
at home. The merchants and manufacturers were only too glad to see
their old rival ruined; the land-owners and nobility were of course
indignant at seeing the “lower classes,” even of a foreign nation, rise
against their lords, even though their lords perhaps deserved their
punishment. It was generally believed, and it was largely true, that
England was fighting for the great principles of Monarchy and Religion,
exemplified by a foolish king and a corrupted priesthood. For a time
everyone supported Pitt’s policy. But the French Revolution had found
many sympathizers among the working classes, and after the country had
felt the first severity of the burdens imposed by the war, a spirit of
discontent manifested itself. But the nation at large was against this
opposition, and drastic measures were taken to silence it. Pitt was
indomitable till his death (in 1805), and under his guidance England
often fought single-handed against the world. {173} At times, as in
1796, she was threatened with invasion by the French, and the Irish, or
a certain section of them, assisted her would-be invaders. At another
time (1806), English industry was threatened with ruin by Napoleon’s
Berlin Decree, forbidding Continental nations to trade with us.[49] But
at last the great inspiring genius of England’s enemies was defeated,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account