The Industrial History of EnglandGibbins, Henry de Beltgens
History
The Industrial History of England
Gibbins, Henry de Beltgens
Great Britain -- Economic conditions; Industries -- Great Britain -- History
practice of cheap gang-labour was defended as being necessary to
profitable agriculture; which means that tenants were too cowardly or
too obtuse to resist rents which they could not pay except by employing
pauperized and degraded labour. Amid times like these Joseph Arch grew
up, and it was not till 1872 (at which time it will be remembered that
British farmers were doing very well) that he began the agitation which
resulted in the formation of the National Agricultural Labourers’
Union. His difficulties in organizing the downtrodden labourers were
enormous, but he finally succeeded in spite of the resentment of
agricultural {209} employers. His efforts have already done much
to improve the material condition of the labourers, and wages have
decidedly risen from this and other causes. But they certainly cannot
be called high.
§ 6. THE PRESENT CONDITION OF BRITISH AGRICULTURE--It remains to notice
briefly the causes which are now influencing our agricultural industry,
and to point out in what direction we may expect a revival from the
present state of depression. Besides the great fact of the increase
of rents we notice an increase of foreign competition, which is of
comparatively recent date. Our competitors are mainly Russia, America,
and last but by no means least, India. At the time of the Crimean
War, and for some years subsequently, Russian competition ceased to
exist. When it began it, standing alone, was not very serious, for
America had not yet entered the field, and was prevented from doing
so by the sanguinary struggles of the Civil War. High prices for
grain prevailed therefore till some time after America had ceased her
internal conflict, and it was only quite recently that much grain
was grown for export in India. But since 1870 or so England has been
supplied with grain from these three great agricultural lands, and the
English farmer, no longer buoyed up at the expense of the rest of the
community by protective measures, has found it impossible to grow wheat
at a profit at the old rents. Many farmers have been ruined; and at Sir
James Caird’s estimate (in 1886) the loss of the agricultural classes
of all ranks in spendable income has been nearly £43,000,000 _per
annum_. According to this well-known authority rents should therefore
have been reduced by £22,800,000 instead of by much less than half that
amount. Even now the aggregate rental is higher than it was before the
Russian war. In course of time it is certain that the economic action
of {210} supply and demand will bring rents down to something like
their commercial value; meanwhile the English landlords, as Mr W. E.
Bear remarks, have the choice between allowing their old tenants to be
ruined first, and then accepting reduced rents, or granting reductions
soon enough to save men in whom they have hitherto had some confidence
as tenants. It will be necessary also to make important changes in the
laws and customs of land tenure, so that our farmers may have complete
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account