The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
With this auto the murderous activity of the tribunal may be said
virtually to end. Until the end of the century its business consisted
almost exclusively in the commonplace routine of bigamists, blasphemers,
petty sorcerers, soliciting confessors, clerics administering the
sacraments without priest’s orders and the like. Thus in an auto
celebrated January 15, 1696, out of twenty-six penitents, there was but
one heretic with a sanbenito; there was a Greek schismatic reconciled
and the rest were sixteen bigamists, one Franciscan tertiary for
Illuminism, a woman for imposture and four men and two women for the
superstitious practices conveniently classed as sorcery with explicit or
implicit pact with the demon.[472] Yet during this half-century there
were a couple of cases showing that a nearly bloodless career was not
due to any surcease of fanatic zeal. In November, 1673, was arrested a
wandering hermit named Juan Bautista de Cardenas, charged with being
_iluso y alumbrado_, with grave suspicion of sacramentarian heresy.
After giving the customary account of his life he took refuge in
absolute silence, which suggested that he was possessed by a demon, but
exorcism proved unavailing. Sharp torture was then tried, but it
elicited only the usual shrieks of pain. The conclusion drawn from this
was that he was a contumacious heretic and in July, 1675, he was
condemned to relaxation, when, on being notified of it, he only said
that if he was carried to the quemadero he would die for God. The
tribunal however did not dare to execute its own sentence and sent the
papers to the Suprema which, June 22, 1676, altered it to abjuration _de
levi_, deprivation of the habit he wore and exile from the cities of
Mexico and Puebla, adding that the torture had been abusive seeing that
he had not been formally testified against for heresy. The other case
was that of Fray Francisco Manuel de Cuadros, who had left his Order and
practised as a _curandero_, or curer of disease by charms. He was thrown
in prison, November 14, 1663, and during his trial, which was protracted
for nearly fifteen years, he confessed to being an agnostic, except as
to the existence of God, but he admitted that he was ignorant and
half-crazy. At the auto of March 20, 1679, he was condemned to
relaxation after degradation, but at the quemadero he showed signs of
repentance, in virtue of which he was admitted to the sacraments and was
strangled before burning.[473]
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account