The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
Under pain of forfeiture of office the inquisitors were forbidden,
directly or indirectly, by themselves or their kindred, to farm the
public revenues or to prevent their being farmed to the highest bidder.
Neither they nor the salaried officials were to engage in any kind of
trade, under the same penalty. They were not to claim the right of
seizing articles at an appraised price, except under urgent necessity
for the support of the prisoners or buildings of the Inquisition. Their
negroes were not to carry arms except when accompanying their masters.
They were not to defend commissioners or familiars in frauds on the
revenue nor in refusing to render an account of deposits made with them
by order of court. They were not to detain the couriers and messengers
who served as a rudimentary post-office and were to remove the
prohibition against vessels leaving port or passengers departing without
their licence. They were not to arrest the royal alguazils except for
grave and notorious excess against the Inquisition. They were to be
allowed one alguazil in Vera Cruz and were to dismiss all those
appointed elsewhere.[491] They were not to protect familiars, who held
public office, when prosecuted for official malfeasance, nor
commissioners who held benefices for offences committed in their
character of incumbents. They were not to order universities to grant
degrees in contravention of their statutes, nor were they to interfere
in matters of government apart from their functions. They were not to
excommunicate a viceroy in cases of competencia, nor was the viceroy to
evoke to himself a case that might lead to a competencia. A provision
was also made for the settlement of competencias without the tedious
resort to the councils in Spain. If the senior judge and senior
inquisitor could not agree in their conference, the inquisitors were to
name three ecclesiastical dignitaries to the viceroy, who was to select
one; he was to be adjoined to the judge and inquisitor and the majority
was to decide or, if there were three discordant opinions, the viceroy
was to choose between them.[492]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account