The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
collectively and individually, and rendered sentence, May 17, 1662, in
the audience-chamber, where all the officials were assembled. Estrada
was condemned to severe reprimand, to a fine of 1500 pesos and to four
years’ suspension, though, as he had died October 26, 1661, the penalty
fell only on his heirs. Higuera was sentenced to a fine of a hundred
pesos and two years’ suspension, which he endured until May 16, 1664.
Mañozca was visited more heavily with a fine of 1300 pesos and nine
years of suspension.[507] This he could afford to disregard for, in the
autumn of 1661, he had been provided with the bishopric of Santiago de
Cuba whence, in 1666, he was transferred to that of Guatemala and
finally, in 1675, he obtained the wealthy see of Puebla, from which he
had driven Palafox. Retributive justice, however, at last overtook him,
for he died before he could take possession.[508] Such were the men who
largely filled the tribunals and episcopates of the Colonies.
* * * * *
Among the privileges claimed by the Inquisition was exemption from
military service. This was strictly limited by the Concordia of 1633.
Officials holding commissions from the inquisitor-general were exempted
from appearing in the general musters, but familiars were not, unless
actually on duty for the tribunal and, if the enemy was in sight, all
were liable to service, save those necessary to guard the papers and
records of the tribunal, to whom certificates were to be given. As might
be expected, however, little respect was paid to these provisions. In
1685, the alcalde of Puebla called a muster of the citizens to march to
the succor of Campeachy. Hipolito del Castillo, alguazil and familiar,
claimed exemption, to which he was clearly not entitled. The alcalde
threatened to send him on a mule to Campeachy and in effect threw him
into prison, placed his head in the pillory and made him pay a fine of
120 pesos. The commissioner at Puebla defended Castillo and, on appeal
to the Inquisition, it ordered the money to be returned. Again, in 1718,
when eight companies of merchants were formed in Puebla, by order of the
viceroy, to make the rounds of the city and drive out malefactors,
Martínez de Castro, a familiar and trader, was enrolled; he protested
and appealed to the Inquisition, which ordered his discharge, in which
the authorities immediately acquiesced.[509]
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account