The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The political functions assumed by the Inquisition become especially
manifest in its trials of the two chief martyrs of the war of
independence--Hidalgo and Morelos. The former of these, Miguel Hidalgo y
Castilla, the parish priest of los Dolores, who first raised the
standard of revolt, in conjunction with Allende, Aldama and Abasolo, and
who was elected generalissimo of the insurgent army, was a singularly
interesting character.[535] Born in 1753, he received his education at
the royal university of San Nicolás at Mechoacan, where he became rector
and theological professor. In the formal accusation during his trial it
is asserted that he was known while there as _el zorro_, or the fox, on
account of his cunning, and that he was finally expelled because of a
scandalous adventure, in the course of which he was obliged to escape at
night through a window of the chapel. Taking orders, he finally settled
as _cura_ at los Dolores where, in spite of a large revenue, he
encumbered himself with debts. He loved music and dancing and gaming and
his relations with women were of a character common enough with the
clergy of the period. His abounding energy led him to establish
potteries and to introduce silk-culture, which may doubtless account for
his indebtedness. He was regarded as a prodigy of learning and kept up
his intellectual pursuits, translating tragedies of Racine and comedies
of Molière, the latter of which he caused to be acted in his house, his
favorite being Tartufe. The priest, García de Carrasqueda, who enjoyed
his intimacy for twelve or thirteen years, when on trial by the
Inquisition, deposed that they used to read together Cicero, Serri,
Fleury’s Ecclesiastical History, Rollings Ancient History and an Italian
work on commerce by Genovesi and that he praised highly the orations of
Æschines and Demosthenes, Bossuet, Buffon’s Natural History, Pitavak’s
Causes Célèbres and various historical works. He was fond of debating
questionable points in theology, emitting opinions not wholly orthodox
on such subjects as the stigmata of St. Francis, the House of Loreto,
the Veronica, whether St. Didymas or Gestas was the penitent thief, the
inheritance of original sin, the identity of the three kings and the
like, while his high reputation for learning caused him to be regarded
as an authority. Altogether he presents himself to us as a man of
unusual physical and intellectual energy, not over nice as to the
employment of those energies, of wide culture, of vigorous and enquiring
mind and of small reverence for formulas or for authority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account