The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
So far he had had to deal with the episcopal Inquisition in the hands of
an opposing faction; even severer experiences were in store for him from
the Holy Office, used as an instrument by the Viceroy Toledo who desired
to get rid of him. One of the earliest acts of the Lima tribunal was to
entertain a denunciation of him, in which his intemperate utterances
were again brought forward, together with the further accusation that he
had banished from Tucuman all who had been concerned in his prosecution
and that he had said that he had been forced to confess to what he had
not done. March 14, 1570, Cerezuela ordered his arrest with
sequestration of property; Toledo undertook to execute the mandate and
in reporting to the king stated that Aguirre’s government was such that
most of the inhabitants were leaving the province. To arrest such a man
was not an easy matter, but it was effected and he was brought three
hundred leagues to Lima. Delays were unavoidable in obtaining and
ratifying testimony at such a distance, through a hostile Indian country
which, as the tribunal stated, was entered only once a year. Aguirre
offered to waive the formality of ratifying the testimony in order to
expedite the process, but the fiscal insisted on regularity and the
trial dragged wearily on, as new evidence came in, mostly as to his
arbitrary government and other matters with which the tribunal properly
had no concern. Aguirre fell dangerously ill and was transferred, July
19, 1572, to the house of a familiar, where he was kept strictly
_incomunicado_ and from which he was brought back, April 24, 1574, to
listen to the publication of evidence. It was not until late in 1575 or
early in 1576 that sentence was rendered condemning him to hear mass as
a penitent on a feast-day when no services were allowed in any other
church; he abjured _de vehementi_, was cast in all costs, was recluded
for four months in a convent and was banished perpetually from Tucuman.
The trivial character of the charges is seen in the special stress laid
on his having used charms to cure wounds and toothache, which he was
forbidden to do in future--innocent charms, as he explained, employed
only because no physician was at hand and surely pardonable in the wild
warfare in which he had worn out his life. He retired to the city of
Serena which he had founded, old, sick and penniless. He had spent
thirty-six years and some three hundred thousand pesos in the king’s
service; three of his sons, his brother and three nephews had died in
the same service, and he was too poor and oppressed with debts to make
his way to court and ask reward for his labors. To complete the
destruction of his influence his two remaining sons were prosecuted on
frivolous charges, but the cases seem to have been suspended after the
desired result had been attained. His son-in-law, Francisco de Matienzo,
who had endeavored to prevent his arrest, was prosecuted and fined in
three hundred pesos.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account