The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
The “via ordinaria” meant episcopal jurisdiction exercised in accordance
with the practice of the spiritual courts in other criminal trials as
distinguished from the secret procedure of the Inquisition, which denied
to the accused almost every means of defence. This in the subsequent
struggles was constantly cited by the Neapolitans as their protection,
but it was easily evaded. The Roman Inquisition, it is true, was not
allowed to organize a tribunal with an inquisitor at its head and
commissioners in all the cities, as was the case in the northern
provinces of Italy, and to exhibit its power with the spectacle of autos
de fe, but it had its agents more or less openly and its victims were
transmitted to Rome for trial and execution. Alongside of this, for a
time at least, the episcopal jurisdiction over heresy was fully
recognized and a number of vice-regal letters of the period show that it
was vigorously exercised by some of the prelates, though whether by the
_via ordinaria_ or not does not appear.[163] This gratified the
Neapolitans who, in 1571, sent a deputation to Archbishop Carafa to
congratulate him on his holy labors against the heretics and Jews and to
ask him to express to the pope their satisfaction that these people
should be punished and extirpated by the episcopal Ordinaries, according
to the canons and without the interposition of the secular court.[164]
This is a scarcely veiled hint of the popular detestation of the
Inquisition, whether Spanish or papal, and that this continued unabated
is manifested by the Venetian envoy, Girolamo Lippomani who, in his
relation of 1575, describes the Neapolitans as most religious and filled
with zeal for the love of God, but nevertheless they will not endure the
very name of the Inquisition and would be ready to rise against it as
they have done in the past.[165]
The occasion of this address to the archbishop presumably was a lively
persecution of Judaizers then on foot. There had been many abjurations,
some burnings, and the archbishop was preparing to build cells attached
to the walls of his palace to provide for the confinement of those
sentenced to perpetual prison. There was considerable popular excitement
because an inquisitorial deputy, with the title of vicar, had been sent
from Rome, and there was faction among the citizens, for the number of
accused was large, with kinships ramifying throughout the community.
Cardinal Granvelle, then recently appointed viceroy, in a letter of July
31, 1571, to the Cardinal of Pisa, head of the Roman Inquisition,
expressed his fears of a tumult; he had asked the archbishop to suspend
the prosecutions and postpone building the cells; it would be better to
send, as the pope desired, the accused to Rome, where they would be
vigorously punished. In effect, towards the end of December, four women
and three men were sent as Judaizers to Rome, where they were duly
strangled and burnt on February 9, 1572.[166]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account