The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New GranadaLea, Henry Charles
History
The inquisition in the Spanish dependencies: Sicily—Naples—Sardinia—Milan—the Canaries—Mexico—Peru—New Granada
Lea, Henry Charles
Inquisition
These suggestions were promptly adopted and were embodied in a royal
decree of December 29th, by which two of the officials were banished
within eight days and similar punishment was threatened for any future
attempt to exercise such functions. By January 5, 1747, the Marchese
Brancone, under royal order, was able to report to the Deputati that the
seal and commissions had been surrendered, the inscription over the door
had been changed to “Archivium” and the name of the prison altered to
prisons of S. Francesco and S. Paolo. Archbishop Spinelli was compelled
to resign and, when Benedict XIV sent Cardinal Landi to Naples to seek
some method of re-establishing the tribunal, he was in danger of being
mobbed and was obliged to return without having secured an official
audience. Thus the Inquisition ceased to have a recognized existence in
Naples; the rejoicing was general and, as an expression of its
gratitude, the city made a voluntary offering to Carlos of three hundred
thousand ducats. Yet the Deputati did not disband; taught by past
experience they kept vigilant watch to see that the detested institution
or its methods were not smuggled in and that the ecclesiastical courts
observed the new rules. Carlos was called to the throne of Spain in
1759, by the death of his half-brother Fernando VI, leaving Naples to
his young son, Ferdinando IV. Possibly it may have been thought that
during a minority there was an opportunity to revive the institution
for, in 1761, the Deputati made an appeal to the king. The Regent
Tanucci was not a man to relinquish the advantage gained. The decree of
1746 was again sent to all prelates with commands that it be strictly
obeyed and the royal thanks were conveyed to the Deputati for their
vigilance, which they were ordered not to relax.[196]
They heeded the injunction and, in 1764, they addressed to the king a
memorial on the case of Padre Leopoldo di S. Pasquale, a Bare-footed
Augustinian, who had been tried by his brethren on charges of financial
irregularities and unchastity. Inquisitorial procedure had been
employed, no opportunity for defence had been allowed and, for seven
years, the unfortunate friar had been subjected by his superiors to a
series of inhuman cruelties.[197] What was the result I have no means of
ascertaining, but this prolonged vigilance indicates the profound and
enduring impression entertained of the Inquisition by the Neapolitans.
CHAPTER III.
SARDINIA.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account