The Inside of the Cup — CompleteChurchill, Winston
Science
The Inside of the Cup — Complete
Churchill, Winston
Attitude change -- Fiction; Christian ethics -- Fiction; Christian life -- Fiction; Conscience -- Religious aspects -- Fiction
“Permit me to add,” he said, “that this controversy, in other respects
than doctrine, is more befitting to the Middle Ages than to the
twentieth century, when this Church and other denominations are passing
resolutions in their national conventions with a view to unity and
freedom of belief.”
Mr. Langmaid, Mr. Plimpton, and Mr. Constable sat still. Mr. Ferguson
made no move. It was Gordon Atterbury who rushed into the breach, and
proved that the extremists are allies of doubtful value.
He had, apparently, not been idle since Sunday, and was armed cap-a pie
with time-worn arguments that need not be set down. All of which went to
show that Mr. Goodrich had not referred to the Middle Ages in vain. For
Gordon Atterbury was a born school-man. But he finished by declaring, at
the end of twenty minutes (much as he regretted the necessity of saying
it), that Mr. Hodder's continuance as rector would mean the ruin of the
church in which all present took such a pride. That the great majority
of its members would never submit to what was so plainly heresy.
It was then that Mr. Plimpton gathered courage to pour oil on the
waters. There was nothing, in his opinion, he remarked smilingly, in
his function as peacemaker, to warrant anything but the most friendly
interchange of views. He was second to none in his regard for Mr.
Hodder, in his admiration for a man who had the courage of his
convictions. He had not the least doubt that Mr. Hodder did not desire
to remain in the parish when it was so apparent that the doctrines which
he now preached were not acceptable to most of those who supported
the church. And he added (with sublime magnanimity) that he wished Mr.
Hodder the success which he was sure he deserved, and gave him every
assurance of his friendship.
Asa Waring was about to rise, when he perceived that Hodder himself
was on his feet. And the eyes of every man, save one, were fixed on him
irresistibly. The rector seemed unaware of it. It was Philip Goodrich
who remarked to his father-in-law, as they walked home afterwards, of
the sense he had had at that moment that there were just two men in the
room,--Hodder and Eldon Parr. All the rest were ciphers; all had lost,
momentarily, their feelings of partisanship and were conscious only of
these two intense, radiating, opposing centres of force; and no man,
oddly enough, could say which was the stronger. They seemingly met on
equal terms. There could not be the slightest doubt that the rector
did not mean to yield, and yet they might have been puzzled if they had
asked themselves how they had read the fact in his face or manner. For
he betrayed neither anger nor impatience.
No more did the financier reveal his own feelings. He still sat back in
his chair, unmoved, in apparent contemplation. The posture was familiar
to Langmaid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account