The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
Now, since in the received theories the accumulated “productive goods”
are conceived to be the most consequential factor in industry, and
therefore in the community’s material welfare and in the fortunes of
individuals, it logically follows that the discretionary ownership of
them has come to be accounted the most important relation in which
men may stand to the production of wealth and to the community’s
livelihood; and the pecuniary transactions whereby this ownership is
arranged, manipulated and redistributed are held to be industrially
the most productive of all human activities. It is only during the
nineteenth century that this doctrine of pecuniary productivity has
been worked out into finished shape and has found secure lodgment in
the systematic structure of economic theory--in the current theory of
“the Function of the Entrepreneur;”[115] but it is also only during
this period that business enterprise (pecuniary management) has come
to dominate the economic situation in a substantially unmitigated
degree, so that the material fortunes of the community have come to
depend on these pecuniary negotiations into which its “captains of
industry” enter for their own gain.[116] In the sense that no other
line of activity stands in anything like an equally decisive relation
of initiative or discretion to the industrial process, or bears with a
like weight on the material welfare of the community, these business
negotiations in ownership are unquestionably the prime factor in modern
industry. But that such is the case is due to the peculiar institutions
of modern times and to the peculiar current state of the industrial
arts; and the former of these peculiar circumstances is conditioned by
the latter.
* * * * *
It is not practicable to assign a hard and fast date from which this
modern era began, with its peculiar scheme of economic life and the
economic conceptions that characterise it. The date will vary from
one country to another, and even from one industrial class to another
within the same country. But it can be said that historically the
modern era begins with the rise of handicraft; it is along the line
of growth marked out by the development of handicraft that the modern
technology has emerged, together with that industrial organisation and
those pecuniary conceptions of economic efficiency and serviceability
that have gradually come to their current state of maturity on the
ground afforded by this technology. What historically lies back of the
era of handicraft is not of a piece with the economic situation of
modern times; nor is it characteristic of the Western civilisation,
as contrasted with the agricultural and predatory civilisations of
antiquity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account