The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
The characteristic, and apparently decisive, peculiarities of the
British situation may all confidently be traced to the insular position
of the country. Owing to the isolation so given to the Island the
British community was notably in arrears in early modern times, as
contrasted with the more cultured, populous and wealthier peoples of
the Continent; and this backward state of England in the earlier period
of the era of handicraft is no less marked in respect of technology
than in any other. As is well known, England borrowed extensively and
persistently from its Continental neighbours throughout the era, and
it was only by help of these borrowed elements that the English were
able to overtake and finally to take the lead of their competitors.
Similarly, the British commercial development also comes on late
as compared with the Continent; so much so that the British had
substantially no share in the great expansion of business enterprise
that has been called the Age of the Fuggers. This late start of the
English, coupled with their peculiar advantage in being able to borrow
what their neighbours had worked out, conduced to a more rapid rate and
shorter run of industrial advance and expansion in the Island, and so,
among other consequences, hindered the rounded system of handicraft,
industrial towns, and gild organisation from attaining the same degree
of finality, and ultimately of obstructive inertia, that resulted in
many of the Continental countries.
Again, owing to the same geographic isolation that long held England
culturally in arrears, the English community lay, in great measure,
outside of that political “concert of nations” that worked out the
exhaustion and collapse of industry and business on the Continent.
Not that the English took no interest in the grand whirl of politics
and princely war that occupied the main body of Christendom in that
time. The English crown, or to use a foreign expression, the English
State, was deeply enough implicated in the political intrigues of late
mediæval and early modern Europe; but as modern time has advanced
the English community has visibly hung back with an ever growing
reluctance. And whatever may be conceived to be the share of the
English crown in the political complications of the Continent, it
remains true that the English community at large, during the mature
and concluding phases of the era of handicraft, stood mainly and
habitually outside of these princely concerns.[127] In effect, after
the handicraft era was well under way, England is never for long or
primarily engaged in international war, nor, except for the civil war
of the Commonwealth period, in destructive war of any kind. Hence the
era runs to a different outcome in England from what it does elsewhere.
It ends not in the exhaustion of politics, but in the industrial
revolution. The close of the handicraft system in England comes by way
of a technological revolution, not by collapse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account