The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
It is
not that the era of handicraft was an era of reversion to savagery,
but only that the tone-giving factor in the community of that time
reverted, by force of the state of the industrial arts, to habits of
peace and industry, in which direct and detailed manual work takes a
leading place. There is also the further point of economic contact
with the savage state that in the handicraft community distinctions
of wealth are neither large nor of decisive consequence during the
long period of habituation that brought the preconceptions of that era
into the settled shape that gave them the character of a finished and
balanced system of principles.
It may be added, at the risk of tedious repetition, that the habits of
life characteristic of the era, as well as the frame of mind suited
to this characteristic routine of life, seem peculiarly suited to the
native endowment of the European peoples,--perhaps in an especial
degree suited to the native bent of those sections of the population
in which there is an appreciable admixture of the dolicho-blond
stock. That such may be the case is at least strongly suggested by
the tenacious hold which this system of Rights apparently still has
on the sentimental allegiance of these Western peoples, after the
conditions to which these Rights owe their rise, and to which they are
suited, have in the main ceased to exist; as well as by the somewhat
blind fervour with which these peoples, and more especially the
English-speaking section of them, go about the idyllic enterprise of
rehabilitating that obsolescent “competitive system” that embodied the
system of Natural Rights, and that came up with the era of handicraft
and went under in its dissolution.
CHAPTER VII
THE MACHINE INDUSTRY
The era of the machine industry has been designated variously, to
answer to the varying point of view from which it has been considered
by divers writers. As an historical era it shows divers traits, more or
less characteristic, and it has been designated by one or another of
these traits according to the particular line of interest that may have
directed the attention of those who have had occasion to name it. It is
spoken of as the era of the factory system, of large-scale industry,
as the age of Capitalism or of free competition, or again as an era of
the credit economy. But as seen from the point of view of technology,
and more specifically from that of workmanship as it underlies the
technological system, it is best characterised as the era of the
machine industry, or of the machine process. As a technological period
it is commonly conceived to take its rise in the British industrial
community about the third quarter of the eighteenth century, the
conventional date of the Industrial Revolution,--those who have a taste
for precise dates assigning it more specifically to the sixties of that
century, to coincide with the earliest practical use of certain large
mechanical inventions of that age.[138]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account