The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial artsVeblen, Thorstein
Philosophy
The instinct of workmanship, and the state of industrial arts
Veblen, Thorstein
Industrial arts -- History; Industries -- History; Technology -- History; Workmanship -- History
So, _e. g._, in England, say from the sixteenth century onward, there
are improvements in highways and waterways and in the drainage of
agricultural lands; and, as an instance more obviously related to the
machine industry as commonly apprehended, there comes early in the
eighteenth century the “horse-hoing cultivation” on which Jethro Tull
spent his enthusiasm. Along with this obviously mechanical line of
endeavour and innovation is also to be noted the deliberate efforts to
improve the races of sheep and cattle that were in progress about the
same time. These are perhaps not to be rated as mechanical inventions
in the simple and obvious sense of the phrase, but they have this
trait in common with the inventions of the machine era that they turn
ascertained facts of brute nature to account for human use by a logic
that has much of that character of impersonal incidence that marks
the machine technology. The machine industry comes on gradually;
its initial stages are visible in the early eighteenth century, but
it is only toward the close of that century that its effects on the
industrial system become so pronounced that the era of the machine
technology may fairly be said to have set in; and it is only in Great
Britain that it can be said to prevail at that period.
Of the other features above alluded to as characteristic of this period
of history none are of so substantial a character or so distinctive
of this particular period as its technological peculiarities. Free
competition, _e. g._, belongs as much to the era of handicraft as to
that of the machine, having prevailed--more extensively in theory
than in practice--under the former régime as under the latter; and
in point of fact it gradually falls under increasing restrictions as
the machine age advances, until in the more highly developed phases
of the current situation it has largely ceased to be a practicable
line of policy in industrial business. So, also, Capitalism did not
take its rise coincident with the industrial revolution, although its
best development and largest expansion may lie within the machine age.
It had its beginnings in the prosperous days of handicraft, and one
capitalistic era had already run its course, on the Continent, before
the machine industry came in. The “credit economy,” associated with
the capitalistic management of industry, is also of older growth, so
far as regards the days of its early vigour, although the larger and
more far-reaching developments of credit come effectually into play
only in the later decades of the machine age. Much the same is true
of the so-called large-scale organisation of industry and the factory
system. Its highest development comes with the advanced stages of the
machine technology and is manifestly conditioned by the latter, but it
was already a force to be counted with at the time of the industrial
revolution. The large-scale industry contemplated, with a degree of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account