The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Until the Government has acquired all the powers of employment that the
private employers now possess, it can give nothing to starving women,
but outdoor relief with money taken by taxation from the employers and
their landlords and financiers, which is just what any unsocialist
government does. To acquire those powers it must itself become the
national landlord, the national financier, and the national employer.
In other words, it cannot distribute the national income equally
until it, instead of the private owners, has the national income to
distribute. Until it has done so you cannot practise Socialism even
if you want to: you may even be severely punished for trying. You may
agitate and vote for all the steps by which equalization of income will
be reached; but in your private life you cannot do otherwise than you
have to do at present: that is, keep your social rank (know your place,
as it is called), paying or receiving the usual wages, investing your
money to the best advantage, and so forth.
You see, it is one thing to understand the aim of Socialism, and
quite another to carry it into practice, or even to see how it can
or ever could be carried into practice. Jesus tells you to take no
thought for the morrow’s dinner or dress. Matthew Arnold tells you
to choose equality. But these are commandments without laws. How can
you possibly obey them at present? To take no thought for the morrow
as we now are is to become a tramp; and nobody can persuade a really
intelligent woman that the problems of civilization can be solved by
tramps. As to choosing equality, let us choose it by all means; but
how? A woman cannot go into the streets to rifle the pockets of those
who have more money than she has, and give money away to those who
have less: the police would soon stop that, and pass her on from the
prison cell to the lunatic asylum. She knows that there are things that
the Government may do by law that no private person could be allowed
to do. The Government may say to Mrs Jobson “If you murder Mrs Dobson
(or anyone else) you will be hanged”. But if Mrs Dobson’s husband said
to Mrs Jobson “If you murder my wife I will strangle you” he would be
threatening to commit a crime, and could be severely punished for it,
no matter how odious and dangerous Mrs Jobson might be. In America,
crowds sometimes take criminals out of the hands of the law and lynch
them. If they attempted to do that in England they would be dispersed
by the police, or shot down by the soldiers, no matter how wicked the
criminal and how natural their indignation at the crime.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account