The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
And now I hear you say “My gracious goodness me, what on the face of
the earth has all this to do with the possession of spare money by
ordinary ladies and gentlemen, which you say is all that Capitalism
is?” And I reply, farfetched as it may seem, that it is out of that
innocent looking beginning that our huge burden of poverty and misery
and drink and crime and vice and premature death has grown. When we
have examined the possibilities of this apparently simple matter of
spare money, _alias_ Capital, you will find that spare money is the
root of all evil, though it ought to be, and can be made, the means of
all betterment.
What is spare money? It is the money you have left when you have bought
everything you need to keep you becomingly in your station in life. If
you can live on ten pounds a week in the way you are accustomed and
content to live, and your income is fifteen pounds a week, you have
five pounds spare money at the end of the week, and are a capitalist
to that amount. To be a capitalist, therefore, you must have more than
enough to live on.
Consequently a poor person cannot become a capitalist. A poor person
is one who has less than enough to live on. I can remember a bishop,
who ought to have known better, exhorting the poor in the east end
of London, at a time when poverty there was even more dreadful than
it is at present, to become capitalists by saving. He really should
have had his apron publicly and officially torn off him, and his
shovel hat publicly and officially jumped on, for such a monstrously
wicked precept. Imagine a woman, without enough money to feed her
children properly and clothe them decently and healthily, letting them
starve still more, and go still more ragged and naked, to buy Savings
Certificates, or to put her money in the Post Office Savings Bank and
keep it there until there is enough of it to buy stocks and shares! She
would be prosecuted for neglecting her children: and serve her right!
If she pleaded that the bishop incited her to commit this unnatural
crime, she would be told that the bishop could not possibly have meant
that she should save out of her children’s necessary food and clothing,
or even out of her own. And if she asked why the bishop did not say so,
she would be told to hold her tongue; and the gaoler would be ordered
to remove her to the cells.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account