The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Take the case of a cable laid across the ocean to send messages to
foreign countries. How much a word is the company to charge for the
messages? If the charge is a pound a word very few people can afford to
send them. If the charge is a penny a word the cable will be crowded
with messages all day and all night. Yet the profit may be the same;
and, if it is, it will be far less trouble to send one word at a pound
than two hundred and forty words at a penny.
The same is true of the ordinary telegraph service. When it was in the
hands of private companies, the service was restricted and expensive.
When the Government took it over, it not only extended lines of all
sorts to out-of-the-way places; cheapened the service; and did without
a profit: it actually ran it at what the private capitalist calls a
loss. It did this because the cheap service was such a benefit to
the whole community, including the people who never send telegrams
as well as those who send a dozen every day, that it paid the nation
and was much fairer as well to reduce the price charged to the actual
senders below the cost of the service, the difference being made up by
everybody in taxes.
This very desirable arrangement is quite beyond the power of private
Capitalism, which not only keeps the price as high as possible above
the cost of production and service for the sake of making the utmost
profit, but has no power to distribute that cost over all the people
who benefit, and must levy it entirely on those who actually buy the
goods or pay for the service. It is true that business people can
pass the cost of their telegrams and telephone messages on to their
customers in the price of the things they sell; but a great deal of
our telegraphing and telephoning is not business telegraphing and
telephoning; and its cost cannot be passed on by the senders to anyone.
The only objection to throwing the cost entirely on public taxation is
that if we could all send telegrams of unlimited length without having
to pay across the counter enough ready money to prevent us using the
telegraph service when the post would do as well, or sticking in “kind
regards from all to dear Aunt Jane and a kiss from Baby” at the end of
every message, the lines would be so choked that we should not be able
to send telegrams at all. As to the telephone, some women would hang
on to it all day if it made no difference to their pockets. Even as it
is, a good deal of unnecessary work is put upon the telegraph service
by people spinning out their messages to twelve words because they are
not allowed to pay for less, and they think they are not getting full
value for their money if they say what they have to say in six. It
does not occur to them that they are wasting their own time and that
of the officials, besides increasing their taxes. It seems a trifle;
but public affairs consist of trifles multiplied by as many millions
as there are people in the country; and trifles cease to be trifles
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account