The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalismShaw, Bernard
General
The intelligent woman's guide to socialism and capitalism
Shaw, Bernard
Capitalism; Socialism
Therefore when I say that Capitalism has reduced our people to a
condition of abject helplessness and ignorance in their productive
capacity as workers, you cannot reassure me by pointing out that
factory girls are no fools when it comes to gossiping and amusing
themselves; that they are resourceful enough to learn lip reading in
the weaving-sheds, where the banging of the looms makes it impossible
to hear each other speak; that their dances and charabanc excursions
and whist drives and dressing and wireless concerts stimulate and
cultivate them to an extent unknown to their grandmothers; that
they consume frightful quantities of confectionery; and that they
limit their families to avoid too much mothering. But all this is
consumption, not production. When they are engaged in producing these
amusements: when they take the money for the tickets at the pay-boxes,
or do some scrap of the work of making a charabanc, or wind the wire
on a coil for broadcasting, they are mere machines, taking part in a
routine without knowing what came before or what is to follow.
In giving all the work to one class and all the leisure to another as
far as the law will let it, the Capitalist system disables the rich
as completely as the poor. By letting their land and hiring out their
spare money (capital) to others, they can have plenty of food and fun
without lifting their little fingers. Their agents collect the rent
for the land, and lodge it in the bank for them. The companies which
have hired their spare money lodge the half-yearly hire (dividends)
in the same way. Bismarck said of them that they had only to take a
pair of scissors and cut off a coupon; but he was wrong: the bank does
even that for them; so that all they have to do is to sign the cheques
with which they pay for everything. They need do nothing but amuse
themselves; and they would get their incomes just the same if they
did not do even that. They can only plead that their ancestors worked
productively, as if everybody’s ancestors had not worked productively,
or as if this were any excuse for their not following their ancestors’
excellent example. We cannot live on the virtues of our grandmothers.
They may have farmed their own land, and invented the ways in which
their spare money was applied to the land to make them richer; but when
their successors found that all this trouble would be taken for them by
others, they simply let the land and put out their spare money for hire
(invested it).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account